Teams

GH:WinniGirls:Joyce:Shegog

2022 NH Adult 40 & Over Women Day · 3.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-21vs LNH:RacquetsUp:BouressaLost 13
W#1 DoublesHeidi Bourgeois / Maureen Joyce vs Gabrielle Green / Janice Wiegman6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJolie Hassler vs Heajung Kim-Aiello6-7, 5-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Ciaraldi / Paula Spencer vs Elizabeth Dundas / Patricia Halpin1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSue Ross / PETRICE RANNO vs Chris Bouressa / Kathryn Prolman3-6, 0-6
2022-06-14vs MTS:Scharpf:NippeWon 31
W#1 DoublesHeidi Bourgeois / Jennifer Kelley vs Kimberly Valeri / Heidi Saghir6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJolie Hassler vs Aimee Ayers0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Ciaraldi / Janet McDonough vs Cathleen Scharpf / Sharon Goolbis6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPaula Spencer / Christine Calisi vs Jane Frawley / Rebecca Helme6-2, 6-3
2022-06-07vs CON:Krushers:Rauseo:RadosWon 30
W#1 DoublesBetsy Chapin / Maureen Joyce vs Brigitte Cook / Karley Watt7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Tothill / Joyce Sylvester vs Heidi Waite / Marie Stevens2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMartina Lord / Sue Ross vs Doris Long / Laurie Rauseo6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMartina Lord / Elizabeth Wohler Stowe vs Judy Wild / Barbara Wilson6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesHeidi Bourgeois vs Jennifer Connors6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Ciaraldi / Barbara Shegog vs Lynn Dolan / Keri Craft6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSue Ross / Maureen Joyce vs Aileen Chaltain / Sae-Im Smith6-1, 6-2
2022-05-24vs HH:Weisberg:WalkerWon 31
W#1 DoublesBetsy Chapin / Martina Lord vs Zola Brown / Jocelyn Jones6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHeidi Bourgeois vs Sue Ries6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Ciaraldi / Maureen Joyce vs Jessica Weisberg / Tina Walker2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Calisi / Joyce Sylvester vs Mary Lou Brindisi / Mary Morgan6-2, 6-4
2022-05-17vs LNH:RacquetsUp:BouressaWon 40
W#1 DoublesBetsy Chapin / Maureen Joyce vs Chris Bouressa / Gabrielle Green6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesHeidi Bourgeois vs Jane Peterson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMartina Lord / Julie Ciaraldi vs Janice Wiegman / Elizabeth Dundas6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPETRICE RANNO / Jennifer Kelley vs Patricia Halpin / Gloria Clancy6-2, 6-1
2022-05-10vs MTS:Scharpf:NippeWon 31
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Wohler Stowe / Maureen Joyce vs Cathleen Scharpf / Heidi Saghir3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesHeidi Bourgeois vs Aimee Ayers5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Ciaraldi / Martina Lord vs Rebecca Helme / Susan Johanson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristine Calisi / Nancy Tothill vs Sharon Goolbis / Nancy Donahue4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-03vs CON:Krushers:Rauseo:RadosWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Shegog / Elizabeth Wohler Stowe vs Mary Kruzel / Heather Klein6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHeidi Bourgeois / Martina Lord vs Marie Stevens / Heidi Waite5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaureen Joyce / Joyce Sylvester vs Laurie Rauseo / Doris Long7-5, 6-2
W#1 DoublesBetsy Chapin / Maureen Joyce vs Lynn Dolan / Allegra Lubrano6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Wohler Stowe / Barbara Shegog vs Keri Craft / Susan Valence3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoyce Sylvester / Nancy Tothill vs Judy Csatari / Helen Ainsworth6-3, 7-5
2022-04-19vs HH:Weisberg:WalkerLost 12
L#1 DoublesBetsy Chapin / Barbara Shegog vs Jessica Weisberg / Kimberly Bogle1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Ciaraldi / Janet McDonough vs Zola Brown / Mary Morgan3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMartina Lord / Elizabeth Wohler Stowe vs Nancy Wilbur / Sue Ries2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EXE:Maye:Braasch01033721257
2GH:WinniGirls:Joyce:Shegog01032829321
3YMCA:ConwayNelson:Murray010271335342
4HH:Weisberg:Walker010251537336
5MTS:Scharpf:Nippe010211946363
6LNH:RacquetsUp:Bouressa010162452385
7WWCC:Tidebreakers: Zimmerman:Freund010172352385
8HSB:Weidknecht010162455386
9CON:Krushers:Rauseo:Rados010142657400
10RVC:GoodGollyMsVolley:Gantrish:Arado010122861413
11GB:Merida:Quinn01093166431

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Elizabeth Wohler Stowe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Heidi Bourgeois
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.34
Julie Ciaraldi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Barbara Shegog
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Christine Calisi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Betsy Chapin
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.16
Joyce Sylvester
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
Paula Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
PETRICE RANNO
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Jolie Hassler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.87
Nancy Tothill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Dawn Smith
published
Janet McDonough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Martina Lord
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Maureen Joyce
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sue Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Wohler Stowe + Julie Ciaraldi4162% games+12.8% vs expected
Betsy Chapin + Julie Ciaraldi6260% games+10.0% vs expected
Maureen Joyce + Martina Lord4357% games+6.9% vs expected
Maureen Joyce + Elizabeth Wohler Stowe3359% games+3.4% vs expected
Betsy Chapin + Martina Lord3254% games+2.1% vs expected
Martina Lord + Julie Ciaraldi6162% games+1.8% vs expected
Maureen Joyce + Betsy Chapin11356% games+1.6% vs expected
Barbara Shegog + Elizabeth Wohler Stowe8257% games−0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Wohler Stowe
71W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Heidi Bourgeois
38W–22L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Julie Ciaraldi
57W–27L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Barbara Shegog
39W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Christine Calisi
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Betsy Chapin
107W–63L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Joyce Sylvester
53W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
Paula Spencer
27W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
PETRICE RANNO
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
Jolie Hassler
18W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Nancy Tothill
62W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
Dawn Smith
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet McDonough
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martina Lord
39W–20L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Joyce
33W–20L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Ross
45W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.