Teams

Sportime

2025 18&Over Men · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-23vs Tacos AfterSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeter Green / Eugene Barash vs Alec Cohen / David Koch3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesScott Hefley vs Terry Park6-2, 6-1
2025-07-16vs Northern: WolverinesLost 13
L#1 DoublesArvind Subramanian / Scott Hefley vs Brent Smith / Justin Roe3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJeremy Burstyn vs Brian Spofford7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJiayu Liu / Syed Saeed vs Chris Hanley / Kah Seng Tang4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesEugene Barash / Peter Green vs Eric Stotsky / Benjamin Paultre0-6, 3-6
2025-07-02vs Tacos AfterSplit 22
W#1 DoublesArvind Subramanian / IMRAN SHAH vs Brendan Service / Rajesh Padmanabhan6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSyed Saeed / Syed Saeed vs Alexander Wentworth-Ping / James Galliher6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEugene Barash vs Adam Fishman1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Green / Nikolas Warren vs Dave Netoskie / Enrique Girard4-6, 4-6
2025-06-25vs Northern: WolverinesLost 04
L#1 DoublesJiayu Liu / Nikolas Warren vs Brent Smith / Justin Roe4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesScott Hefley vs Vincent Miller7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEugene Barash / Peter Green vs Mark van Leuven / Benjamin Paultre1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAlberto Cestero vs Brian Spofford1-6, 2-6
2025-06-11vs Tacos AfterLost 12
L#1 DoublesArvind Subramanian / Nikolas Warren vs Alec Cohen / Rajesh Padmanabhan2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJeremy Burstyn vs Donghyeon Chang6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEugene Barash / Jiayu Liu vs Matthew Dennin / Nyle Dennin3-6, 1-6
2025-06-08vs Tacos AfterLost 12
L#1 DoublesJiayu Liu / Padam Singh vs Enrique Girard / David Koch7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeremy Burstyn vs Alexander Wentworth-Ping7-6, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEugene Barash vs Jason Hao3-6, 1-6
2025-06-04vs Northern: WolverinesLost 13
L#1 DoublesScott Hefley / IMRAN SHAH vs Chris Hanley / Brent Smith1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRibhav Mishra / Jiayu Liu vs Kah Seng Tang / Benjamin Paultre6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesEugene Barash vs Robert Schmidt2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Green / MASUM SHAH vs Mark van Leuven / Eric Stotsky3-6, 1-6
2025-05-14vs Northern: WolverinesLost 05
L#1 DoublesArvind Subramanian / Syed Saeed vs Chris Hanley / James Axford5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesVivek Lanka vs Brian Spofford2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRibhav Mishra / Eugene Barash vs Michael Marsh / Brent Smith1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesScott Hefley vs Robert Schmidt6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Green / Jiayu Liu vs Eric Stotsky / Benjamin Paultre4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Jeremy Burstyn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Arvind Subramanian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Scott Hefley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Alberto Cestero
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
IMRAN SHAH
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Peter Green
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.96
Eugene Barash
usually #2 Singles 42%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
Jiayu Liu
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Padam Singh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Syed Saeed
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Vivek Lanka
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Hefley + Syed Saeed2543% games−7.2% vs expected
Eugene Barash + Peter Green044 matchesnot enough data
Eugene Barash + IMRAN SHAH033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Burstyn
10W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Arvind Subramanian
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Hefley
14W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Alberto Cestero
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
IMRAN SHAH
67W–92L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Peter Green
6W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Eugene Barash
7W–37L career · 12 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Jiayu Liu
5W–6L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Padam Singh
14W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Syed Saeed
51W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vivek Lanka
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.