Teams

A18 3.5M WR2 Downing

2025 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 3.5 Men Summer

15 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 3.5 Men Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Avinash Prasad
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.45
Brian Mancino
published 3.5
3.34
Christopher Downing
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Chetak Chakkarwar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bill Heavilin
published 3.5
3.18
Emile Gantous
published
3.10
Jose Muzzi
published
3.07
Harry Pierdomenico
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Clayton Curtis
published 3.5
3.00
Keith Curley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Steven Parker
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Himanshu Patel
published
Mike Drozda
published
Robert Holz
published
Steve Nutt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Parker + Bill Heavilin4161% games+7.4% vs expected
Bill Heavilin + Christopher Downing3258% games+3.3% vs expected
Brian Mancino + Christopher Downing4160% games+3.2% vs expected
Emile Gantous + Steve Nutt4348% games+1.7% vs expected
Steven Parker + Emile Gantous5647% games+0.6% vs expected
Chetak Chakkarwar + Avinash Prasad2446% games−6.0% vs expected
Steven Parker + Keith Curley2641% gamesnot enough data
Steven Parker + Steve Nutt4354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Avinash Prasad
36W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Brian Mancino
39W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Christopher Downing
93W–82L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Chetak Chakkarwar
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Bill Heavilin
43W–30L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Emile Gantous
39W–48L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Jose Muzzi
49W–48L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Harry Pierdomenico
12W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Clayton Curtis
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Keith Curley
21W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Steven Parker
43W–81L career · 5 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84
Himanshu Patel
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Drozda
26W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Holz
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Nutt
77W–74L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.