Teams

Quast+Stander/18/6.5/CWN/CP

2026 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 6.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 NO (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Adele Perino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Dorie Delucca
published
3.25
Therese Gremillion
published
3.21
Mary Kathryn Hayes
published
3.19
Casey Duplantier
published 3.5
3.14
Anna Stenger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.10
Goudeau Renee
published
3.03
Katie McKay
published
3.02
Molly Quast
published
3.01
Meghan Stander
published
2.85
Adrienne Duncan
published 3
2.80
Sarah Junius
published
Mallory Barkerding
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Therese Gremillion + Anna Stenger303 matchesnot enough data
Anna Stenger + Katie McKay123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adele Perino
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Dorie Delucca
4W–13L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Therese Gremillion
20W–9L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Mary Kathryn Hayes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Casey Duplantier
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3
Anna Stenger
15W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
Goudeau Renee
8W–23L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Katie McKay
7W–11L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Molly Quast
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Meghan Stander
21W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Adrienne Duncan
19W–8L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Sarah Junius
16W–9L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Mallory Barkerding
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.