Teams

Simply Smashing

2024 55 & Over Fall Women - NA · 6.0 Tuesday Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-10vs TBM - HOAWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Fair / Sandra Franke vs Karen Lawrence / Denise Barrett6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPeggy Ussery / Shannon Wagner vs Cindy Linville / Janis Wommack6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesClaire Coco / Linda Gibson vs Jan Keen / Marilyn Koch3-6, 4-6
2024-11-12vs Sonterra SolLost 12
W#1 DoublesSheila Wilson / Peggy Ussery vs Rose Stawick / Sue Baillio3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHolly Nelson / Michelle McNatt vs Kathie Young / Lisa Womack6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDanna Halff / Mary Druck vs Kim Griffin / Kelli Grant2-6, 3-6
2024-10-29vs TBM - HOAWon 21
L#1 DoublesClaire Coco / Danna Halff vs Denise Barrett / Gail Collamore7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPeggy Ussery / Sheila Wilson vs Cindy Linville / Kimberly Weldon6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichelle McNatt / Holly Nelson vs Marilyn Koch / Pam Colvin6-1, 6-2
2024-10-08vs Sonterra SolLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Druck / Michelle McNatt vs Sue Baillio / Kathie Young0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Fair / Danna Halff vs Kim Griffin / Rainy Evans6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStacy Gallo / Holly Nelson vs Tracy Gilmer / Denise Jones7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Tuesday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Peggy Ussery
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Julia Armstrong
published
2.81
Claire Coco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Stacy Gallo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Danna Halff
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Michelle McNatt
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Linda Gibson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Fair
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Druck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sandra Franke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sheila Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle McNatt + Stacy Gallo1741% games−6.4% vs expected
Julie Fair + Sandra Franke7749% gamesnot enough data
Julia Armstrong + Danna Halff224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle McNatt + Peggy Ussery123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peggy Ussery
29W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04
Julia Armstrong
26W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Claire Coco
23W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
Stacy Gallo
18W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Danna Halff
11W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Michelle McNatt
11W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Linda Gibson
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Julie Fair
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Druck
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Franke
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Wilson
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.