Teams

MPettit (OPRC)

2026 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Sat AM

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-18vs NWillis (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 SinglesKim Cochran vs Nicole Yudin7-6, 6-0
W#3 SinglesJennifer Gardiner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-11vs NWillis (Park Road)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Drake vs Monica Erb0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCaroline Pickup vs Dorothy Cato3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Super vs Julie Busha2-6, 2-6
2026-07-03vs NWillis (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 SinglesKim Cochran vs Jane Sickles6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesLiz Ostrow vs Nicole Yudin6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-06-27vs NWillis (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 SinglesLiz Ostrow vs Dorothy Cato6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCaroline Pickup vs Julie Busha6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesCarolyn Drake vs Chelse Stevens6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-13vs NWillis (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Drake vs Monica Erb6-7, 5-4
W#2 SinglesJennifer Gardiner vs Christina Peterson6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesSuzy Johnson vs Julie Busha3-6, 5-7
2026-06-06vs NWillis (Park Road)Won 21
W#1 SinglesKim Cochran vs Nicole Yudin6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCourtney Reynolds vs Jane Sickles6-7, 5-7
W#3 SinglesLiz Ostrow vs Julie Busha4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 40 & Over Singles 4.5 Women - Sat AM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MPettit (OPRC)429920142
2NWillis (Park Road)2481023184

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Liz Ostrow
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.18
Jennifer Gardiner
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
4.14
Kim Cochran
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.10
Courtney Reynolds
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Carolyn Drake
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Caroline Pickup
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.91
Suzy Johnson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.56
Margy Pettit
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Elizabeth Super
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Gardiner + Caroline Pickup314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liz Ostrow
18W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Jennifer Gardiner
21W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Kim Cochran
20W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.14
4.5
Courtney Reynolds
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Carolyn Drake
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
4
Caroline Pickup
245W–112L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.08
Suzy Johnson
35W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Margy Pettit
51W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Elizabeth Super
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.