Teams

Bako - Team Point Break Winter 2026

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 3.5 - Bakersfield

16 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-08vs Bako - Team RackettsWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichelle Pisano / Beverly Wetterholm vs Cindy Goodmon / Colleen Paulden7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJessie Blackwell vs Rebecca Badgett6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCheyanne Antongiovanni / Marri Tillema vs Leah Coughlin / Mary Wilkening6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacy DeVries / Crystal Neptune vs Luann Shults / Jeannie Munn6-4, 7-6
2026-02-22vs Bako - LLW - Team getAgripLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeverly Wetterholm / Lauren Huynh vs Minda Owens / Rhonda Slegers6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNicola Wright / Megan Reed vs Jasmin Batiste / Agnes DeJong2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStacy DeVries / Cheryl Garone vs Sheryl Idica Ocampo / SUZANNE TEVELDE3-6, 5-7
2026-02-08vs Bako - Team RackettsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessie Blackwell / Lauren Huynh vs Susan Frakes / Kori Harrison3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNicola Wright vs Colleen Paulden6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacy DeVries / Marri Tillema vs Cindy Goodmon / Luann Shults6-4, 6-0
2026-01-25vs Bako - LLW - Team getAgripLost 13
L#1 DoublesCheryl Garone / Miranda Hwang vs Agnes DeJong / Jasmin Batiste6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJessie Blackwell vs Tanya Mussatto6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNicola Wright / Beverly Wetterholm vs Diane Bashirtash / Meghan Carnegie3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKrista Rodriguez / Christy Hornbuckle vs SUZANNE TEVELDE / Sheryl Idica Ocampo4-6, 1-6
2026-01-18vs Bako - Team RackettsLost 13
L#1 DoublesNicola Wright / Krista Rodriguez vs Colleen Paulden / Cindy Goodmon3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Pisano vs Rebecca Badgett3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesErika Gatson / Miranda Hwang vs Leah Coughlin / Brenda Kettler6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCrystal Neptune / Cheryl Garone vs Sandra Gamboa / Susan Frakes4-6, 0-6
2026-01-04vs Bako - LLW - Team getAgripLost 13
L#1 DoublesCheyanne Antongiovanni / Christy Hornbuckle vs Minda Owens / Rhonda Slegers5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Reed vs Jasmin Batiste1-6, 1-3
L#2 DoublesMichelle Pisano / Lauren Huynh vs Diane Bashirtash / Meghan Carnegie1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarri Tillema / Krista Rodriguez vs Sheryl Idica Ocampo / Tanya Mussatto7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women's 3.5 - Bakersfield
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bako - LLW - Team getAgrip4215920182
2Bako - Team Racketts3391532226
3Bako - Team Point Break Winter 202624121227226

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Jessie Blackwell
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Lauren Huynh
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Cheyanne Antongiovanni
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Erika Gatson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Beverly Wetterholm
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Michelle Pisano
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.12
Crystal Neptune
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Krista Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Cheryl Garone
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Nicola Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.98
Miranda Hwang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Cheyenne Romanini
published 3.5
2.94
Christy Hornbuckle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Megan Reed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.90
Marri Tillema
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Stacy DeVries
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessie Blackwell + Lauren Huynh404 matchesnot enough data
Marri Tillema + Stacy DeVries213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessie Blackwell
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
Lauren Huynh
11W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Cheyanne Antongiovanni
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Erika Gatson
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Beverly Wetterholm
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Michelle Pisano
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Crystal Neptune
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Krista Rodriguez
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Cheryl Garone
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Nicola Wright
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Miranda Hwang
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
3.5
Cheyenne Romanini
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
3.5
Christy Hornbuckle
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.94
Megan Reed
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Marri Tillema
49W–64L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
Stacy DeVries
13W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.