Teams

Valentine/18/3.5/TRI/LCRC

2025 Lake Charles Tri Level 18 & Over - Men · 3.5,3.0,2.5 LC (18&O) Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-17vs Meaux/18/3.5/TRI/LCRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesSonat Por / Dean Manning vs Andrew LeBlanc / Jack Vanchiere2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesNathan Morrow / Todd Melton vs Garett Istre / Matt Forest4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-10vs Meaux/18/3.5/TRI/LCRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaul Gonsoulin / Sonat Por vs Carl Comeaux / Lance Thomas1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMark Valentine / Jeffrey Davis vs Jared Meaux / Brett Carlisle7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNathan Morrow / Todd Melton vs Matt Forest / Matt Beaugh6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-03vs Elouri/18/3.5/Tri/GWLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Valentine / Paul Gonsoulin vs Andrew Beasley / Jeremy Istre1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTodd Melton / Mitch Redd vs Russell Deaver / Craig Manuel6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-27vs Elouri/18/3.5/Tri/GWLost 12
L#1 DoublesSonat Por / Dean Manning vs Peter Gover / Dwight Primeaux2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Ammons / Mark Valentine vs Matthew Morris / Charles Bourg6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNathan Morrow / Mitch Redd vs Craig Manuel / Brandon Broussard2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5,3.0,2.5 LC (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dean Manning
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Paul Gonsoulin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Todd Melton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Mark Valentine
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Mitch Redd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Nathan Morrow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sonat Por
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Valentine + Todd Melton134 matchesnot enough data
Mitch Redd + Todd Melton224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dean Manning
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Gonsoulin
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Todd Melton
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Mark Valentine
13W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Mitch Redd
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Nathan Morrow
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Sonat Por
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.