Teams

MGoodrich/TEvans (Carmel CC)

2023 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-05vs LHoots (Providence Plantation)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesParis Loesch / Molly Morris vs Phyllis Nussman / Stephanie Meadow3-6, 3-6
2023-05-03vs BHanrahan (PLCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMolly Morris / Janat Schramm vs Beth Hanrahan / Gayle Hoy6-2, 6-2
2023-04-13vs LVanderbosch/JSanderson (OPRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBarbara Diachenko / Paris Loesch vs Tina Hough / Patty Woodard6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Friedman / Janat Schramm vs Ellen Carlisle / Elizabeth Neligan6-1, 6-1
2023-03-31vs JSlep (Charlotte Indoor)Won 20
W#1 DoublesParis Loesch / Molly Morris vs Melodie Ohaus / Laura Lucas6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJanat Schramm / Robyn Hoppe vs Joan Slep / Susan Shimulunas6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-17vs KBowman (Weddington)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Diachenko / Paris Loesch vs Faye Childress / Kathi Todd6-2, 6-1
2023-03-03vs LMaloney (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMissy Goodrich / Paris Loesch vs Jane Hadley / Chantal Powers6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Lauren Mulligan
published
3.47
Paris Loesch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.42
Andra Norman
published 3.5
3.36
Robyn Hoppe
published
Dorian Dipangrazio
published 3.5
3.25
Missy Goodrich
published
3.22
Molly Morris
published
3.09
Heidi Friedman
published 3.5
2.99
Janat Schramm
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Barbara Diachenko
published 3.5
2.90
Toni Evans
published
2.43
Stacy Doline
published
Murray Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janat Schramm + Heidi Friedman2342% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Mulligan + Missy Goodrich404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Mulligan
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Paris Loesch
33W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Andra Norman
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Robyn Hoppe
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Dorian Dipangrazio
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Missy Goodrich
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Molly Morris
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Heidi Friedman
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Janat Schramm
31W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Barbara Diachenko
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95
Toni Evans
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.90
Stacy Doline
5W–22L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.43
Murray Walker
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.