Teams

MARIN CC 40AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-22vs MARIN YACHT 40AW3.0ASplit 22
L#1 DoublesKatie Dresow / Suzanna Schreck vs Megan Duplanty / Bonnie Spitz7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDespina Mancini vs Florence Pattison6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Carrasco / Molly Knapp vs Bernadette McCarthy / Barb D Ryan3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAngelica Kirsten / Christina Peppers vs Kim Richard / Coleen Dowling6-2, 6-4
2025-01-18vs MARIN YACHT 40AW3.0AWon 31
W#1 DoublesChristine Carrasco / Brooke Palizi vs Florence Pattison / Kim Richard7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJeanette Groustra vs Catherine Healy6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAngelica Kirsten / Suzanna Schreck vs Michelle Guy / Bernadette McCarthy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMolly Knapp / Noel Stubblefield vs Neneng Grauss / Barb D Ryan7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Thalia Milano
published
3.03
Despina Mancini
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.76
Christina Peppers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brooke Palizi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Christine Carrasco
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Debra Bernier
published 3
2.65
Suzanna Schreck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Angelica Kirsten
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jeanette Groustra
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Katie Dresow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Knapp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Noel Stubblefield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angelica Kirsten + Christina Peppers314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thalia Milano
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Despina Mancini
30W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Christina Peppers
23W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Brooke Palizi
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Christine Carrasco
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debra Bernier
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanna Schreck
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%15%85%
2.65
3
Angelica Kirsten
7W–12L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
Jeanette Groustra
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katie Dresow
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Molly Knapp
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Noel Stubblefield
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.