Teams

Moses - River Creek

2025 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-09vs Goodwin - The Slice is RightWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristin DeMasi / Karen Triplett vs Jane Kim / Tina Stroupe4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNatalia Simek vs Aubrey Goodwin6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndrea Barr / Jennifer Chang vs Joy Gonia / Denise Guthrie5-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKelly Fedorchak / Marianne Moore vs Rebecca McDonald / Kelly Ralston6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKristin DeMasi vs Sara Jane Sherry2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStefanie Benson / Jennifer Chang vs Shelli Burnham / Mary Lentine6-0, 6-0
2025-05-12vs Goodwin - The Slice is RightWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Triplett / Jecholia Jessee vs Tina Stroupe / Frankie Smith6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMadison Humerick vs Aubrey Goodwin6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmanda Klukowski / Jennifer Volk-Fortier vs Liliana Michaels / Jennifer Reda6-1, 6-4
2025-04-21vs Goodwin - The Slice is RightSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJecholia Jessee / Natalia Simek vs Andrea Haufler / Melinda McGowan1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMadison Humerick vs Sandra Kim6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesSandra Moses / Karen Triplett vs Tamara Hurney / Tambre Fetzner6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMadison Humerick vs Ella Rash7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin DeMasi / Kelly Fedorchak vs Rebecca McDonald / Vanessa Moore6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Kelly Fedorchak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Madison Humerick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.54
Sandra Moses
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Natalia Simek
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.46
Leanne Smith
published
2.30
Karen Triplett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Patti Klein
published
Andrea Barr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Amanda Klukowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Kristin DeMasi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.18
Jennifer Volk-Fortier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Jecholia Jessee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Jennifer Chang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.94
Christie FitzGerald
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Triplett + Jecholia Jessee4158% gamesnot enough data
Karen Triplett + Kristin DeMasi303 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Smith + Natalia Simek303 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Klukowski + Jennifer Chang213 matchesnot enough data
Natalia Simek + Kelly Fedorchak213 matchesnot enough data
Kristin DeMasi + Jennifer Chang033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Fedorchak
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Madison Humerick
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Sandra Moses
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
2.54
Natalia Simek
24W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%43%57%
2.52
Leanne Smith
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
Karen Triplett
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Patti Klein
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Andrea Barr
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Amanda Klukowski
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Kristin DeMasi
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Jennifer Volk-Fortier
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Jecholia Jessee
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Jennifer Chang
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
2.5
Christie FitzGerald
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.