Teams

KY/LOU/DOMENE/PURVIS

2022 USTA MIXED 40 & Over · 7.0 ADULT MIXED

20 players · average NTRP 3.56 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 ADULT MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Doug Velander
published 4
3.69
Denise Roby
published 4
3.52
Kendra Purvis
published
3.48
David Biddle
published 3.5
3.39
Christie Wafford
published 3.5
3.30
Elena Marquette
published 3.5
3.25
Scott Tyler
published
3.25
Deena Ombres
published 3.5
3.22
Julie Mann
published
3.11
GENELLE COCHRAN
published 3.5
3.09
Michael Marquette
published
2.87
Richard Meyer
published
Damon Holland
published 3
Bari Calderon
published
Joseph Waldron
published
Lisa Domene
published
MELANIE BABIN
published
Randy Mann
published
SCOTT BABIN
published
Stephen Edling
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elena Marquette + Michael Marquette82045% games−6.4% vs expected
Deena Ombres + Richard Meyer1430% gamesnot enough data
Randy Mann + Julie Mann123 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Edling + Kendra Purvis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Doug Velander
12W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Denise Roby
29W–32L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Kendra Purvis
21W–26L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
David Biddle
26W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Christie Wafford
24W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Elena Marquette
59W–92L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Scott Tyler
30W–27L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Deena Ombres
28W–36L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.25
Julie Mann
21W–21L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
GENELLE COCHRAN
40W–29L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Michael Marquette
34W–76L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Richard Meyer
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Damon Holland
4W–5L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Bari Calderon
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Waldron
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Domene
23W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
MELANIE BABIN
21W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Randy Mann
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
SCOTT BABIN
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Edling
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.