Teams

SAhearn (River Hills Country Club)

2022 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-07vs NAMcVicker (Charlotte Swim)Split 11
L#2 DoublesQuinn Davidson / Carolyn Schaus vs Maebeth Hill / Ashley Barton2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGretchen Hildner / Stephanie McKay vs Nonie McVicker / Mitchell Kelling2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-16vs LPacello (Russell)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesQuinn Davidson / Gretchen Hildner vs Leen Jagers / Jane Royther5-7, 2-6
2022-09-09vs CJensen/CDelorenzo (Ballantyne)Split 11
W#2 DoublesSandra Ahearn / Gretchen Hildner vs Courtney Broadway / Dori Cazorla6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Schaus / Margaret Meyer-Cuno vs Carlene Delorenzo / Christina Pardi0-6, 2-6
2022-08-12vs RHoppe (Carmel)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara Clinton / Carolyn Schaus vs Wendy Rose / Janat Schramm1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kendra Boepple
published
3.49
Sandra Ahearn
published
3.46
Melissa Misplay
published
3.34
Gretchen Hildner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Janice Daniel
published
3.33
Carolyn Schaus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Bertina Brase
published 4
3.17
Gail Clarke
published 3.5
3.16
Quinn Davidson
published
Margaret Meyer-Cuno
published
Stephanie McKay
published
Sue Jeffries
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Schaus + Gretchen Hildner2352% gamesnot enough data
Janice Daniel + Gretchen Hildner033 matchesnot enough data
Gretchen Hildner + Stephanie McKay303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendra Boepple
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Sandra Ahearn
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.49
Melissa Misplay
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Gretchen Hildner
36W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Janice Daniel
41W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Carolyn Schaus
30W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
4
Bertina Brase
0W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.33
3.5
Gail Clarke
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
Quinn Davidson
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.16
Margaret Meyer-Cuno
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie McKay
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue Jeffries
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.