Teams

Naples YMCA / Titmus

2026 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 6.0 Adult 65 & over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-03vs COLLIER /Players Club / CappelloLost 12
W#1 DoublesMartha Scott / Becky Titmus vs Nancy Sims / Gina Dubbe6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Dumont / Nina Akel vs Melanie Rose / Janet Olliges2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Alberich / Christine Huck vs Elizabeth Decamara / Susan Vanderveld2-6, 0-6
2026-02-24vs COLLIER/Adult65&over6.0W / MushockLost 12
W#1 DoublesMartha Scott / Sharon Struthers vs Daphne Cole / Stephanie Eldredge6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNina Akel / Becky Titmus vs Deborah Busa Cellucci / Marybeth Greco4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Dumont / Suzanne Alberich vs Helen Sharp / Rosita Gilsenan1-6, 0-6
2026-02-17vs Players Club / McEwenWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcia McCabe / Martha Scott vs Jane Bookholt / Christi Krieger6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaula Taylor / Becky Titmus vs Dawn Jones / Eileen Maher Illuzzi6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNina Akel / Josephine Angevin vs Corinne Hagerman / Lisa Ann Woodward6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesMartha Scott / Sharon Struthers vs Rosita Gilsenan / Marlene Melone6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJosephine Angevin / Marcia McCabe vs Patricia Albrite / Roxy Painter1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Alberich / Patricia Dumont vs Deborah Busa Cellucci / Marybeth Greco0-6, 1-6
2026-02-10vs COLLIER /Players Club / CappelloLost 12
W#1 DoublesMartha Scott / Sharon Struthers vs Kathleen Greenawalt / Nancy Sims6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Dumont / Becky Titmus vs Linda Vermillion / Susan Vanderveld1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Huck / Paula Taylor vs Marianne Becker / Diane Sullivan4-6, 1-6
2026-01-27vs Players Club / McEwenWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Scott / Sharon Struthers vs Jill McEwen / Lisa Ann Woodward6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNina Akel / Josephine Angevin vs Katie Roberts / Corinne Hagerman7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Huck / Becky Titmus vs Mary Ellen Iles / Jane Bookholt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-20vs COLLIER /Players Club / CappelloWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Scott / Sharon Struthers vs Nancy Sims / Coral-Jeanne O'Connor6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarcia McCabe / Becky Titmus vs Diane Sullivan / Susan Vanderveld6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJosephine Angevin / Paula Taylor vs Judith Cappello / Marianne Becker6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-01-13vs COLLIER/Adult65&over6.0W / MushockLost 03
L#1 DoublesMartha Scott / Sharon Struthers vs Daphne Cole / Maureen Ferguson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarcia McCabe / Becky Titmus vs Patricia Albrite / Stephanie Eldredge4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Alberich / Christine Huck vs Deborah Busa Cellucci / Rosita Gilsenan1-6, 2-6
2026-01-06vs Players Club / McEwenLost 12
L#1 DoublesMartha Scott / Becky Titmus vs Jill McEwen / Corinne Hagerman6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMarcia McCabe / Paula Taylor vs Eileen Maher Illuzzi / Joanne sullivan6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Dumont / Suzanne Alberich vs Janet Brunell / Bobbie SCHADT3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0 Adult 65 & over - Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1COLLIER /Players Club / Cappello8119821213
2COLLIER/Adult65&over6.0W / Mushock45141329217
3Naples YMCA / Titmus45131432237
4Players Club / McEwen2781942291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Becky Titmus
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Marcia McCabe
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.10
Christine Huck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Josephine Angevin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Martha Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nina Akel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Patricia Dumont
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Paula Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sharon Struthers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Suzanne Alberich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Scott + Sharon Struthers6168% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Dumont + Suzanne Alberich033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Becky Titmus
3W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Marcia McCabe
29W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Christine Huck
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Josephine Angevin
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martha Scott
9W–3L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nina Akel
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Dumont
0W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paula Taylor
26W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Struthers
6W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Alberich
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.