Teams

MVL.McClenny

2023 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-20vs TOC.LarrichioWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Alberico Menozzi vs Tom Larrichio / Tim Bradshaw6-3, 6-4
2023-05-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Jonathan Navarro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-29vs MD.MoriartyWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard McClenny / Stephen Laroche vs William Carter / James Moriarty6-4, 6-2
2023-04-15vs TOC.AlbertWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard McClenny / Jonathan Navarro vs George Newsome / David Turner6-2, 6-4
2023-03-11vs TOC.AlbertWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard McClenny / Jonathan Navarro vs Casey Black / Jonathan Hodges4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Jones / Richard McClenny vs William Carter / Kevin Simpson6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Kevin Powell
published
4.28
Richard McClenny
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.27
Alejandro Pascacio
published 4.5
4.25
T Brandon Brown
published
4.25
Tim Rufiange
published
4.19
Stephen Laroche
published
4.13
Erik J Erikson
published
4.09
Shaun Ward
published
3.83
William Jones
published
Jason Abhau
published
Jonathan Navarro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alejandro Pascacio + Stephen Laroche4156% gamesnot enough data
Erik J Erikson + Richard McClenny123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin Powell
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
4.35
4.5
Richard McClenny
429W–129L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Alejandro Pascacio
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
4.27
T Brandon Brown
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
Tim Rufiange
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
Stephen Laroche
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
Erik J Erikson
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.13
Shaun Ward
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
William Jones
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.83
Jason Abhau
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonathan Navarro
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.