Teams

CTL75/Gillespie/Indep

75 & Over · 75 & Over 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-12vs LCTA75/Bath/CTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLinda Gillespie / Rebecca Krueger vs Renee Lowry / Gloria Prindle1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoey Rothfuss / Sandy Trexler vs Susan Bynum / Mary Young2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Donelan / Lorelle Wise vs Leonie Leventhal / Frances Bath3-6, 3-6
2025-10-12vs MCTA75/Fox/RHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Estes / Lou Griffin vs Sally Lowrance / Suzanne Roxburgh1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoey Rothfuss / Rebecca Krueger vs Dianne Petrosino / Wilma Pinter1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLorelle Wise / Beth Donelan vs Linda Cunningham / Jeanne Stone6-7, 6-7
2025-10-10vs GATA/75/FINKBEINER/GTWD/SLV/CLTNLost 12
W#1 DoublesBeth Estes / Martha Cartin vs Fran Castle / Kathie Kase6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLou Griffin / Lorelle Wise vs Bev Gebicke / Kat Finkbeiner4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Donelan / Sandy Trexler vs Barbara Fayad / Susie Madden4-6, 3-6
2025-10-10vs HHTL75/Kenworthy/Spring LakeLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoey Rothfuss / Rebecca Krueger vs Ashild Athanas / Lila Mellen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandy Trexler / Lorelle Wise vs Linda Applegate / Pamela Kurtz0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLou Griffin / Beth Estes vs Jeanette Johnson / Pat Kenworthy6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 75 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Beth Donelan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Martha Cartin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Beth Estes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.75
Lou Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Sandy Trexler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Joey Rothfuss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Gillespie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lorelle Wise
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rebecca Krueger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Cartin + Beth Estes13756% games+1.1% vs expected
Lou Griffin + Lorelle Wise3252% games−6.2% vs expected
Lou Griffin + Beth Estes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Donelan
2W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Cartin
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Beth Estes
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.02
Lou Griffin
15W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.75
Sandy Trexler
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Joey Rothfuss
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Gillespie
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lorelle Wise
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Krueger
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.