Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.5M/Moreno/EPTC#4

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-11-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesJose Hernandez-Bravo vs Angel Garcia6-3, 6-4
2025-10-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesJose Hernandez-Bravo vs Isaac Licona7-6, 6-3
2025-10-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesJose Hernandez-Bravo vs Raul Puentes-Lowry4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJose Hernandez-Bravo vs Carlos Franco2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-23Won 10
W#1 SinglesJose Hernandez-Bravo vs Alejandro Contreras6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-09Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJose Hernandez-Bravo vs Tyson Jones6-3, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
David Milne
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.46
Carlos Zamora
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.45
Cristian Trejo
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
3.15
Armando Nocedal Santiago
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
Jose Hernandez-Bravo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jose Moreno
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Juan Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
LARRY MELENDEZ
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
Nicholas Roacho
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Norm Estrada
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Peter Recio
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Ray Bonds
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Steven King
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Trevor Hjalmquist
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 26% · published
Zaphnath Jaramillo
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ray Bonds + David Milne15161% gamesnot enough data
Norm Estrada + Nicholas Roacho5352% gamesnot enough data
Norm Estrada + Juan Herrera4350% gamesnot enough data
Jose Moreno + Jose Hernandez-Bravo6166% gamesnot enough data
Jose Moreno + David Milne5156% gamesnot enough data
Juan Herrera + Nicholas Roacho4157% gamesnot enough data
LARRY MELENDEZ + Carlos Zamora213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Milne
26W–3L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Carlos Zamora
26W–4L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Cristian Trejo
22W–12L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Armando Nocedal Santiago
13W–8L career · 9 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Jose Hernandez-Bravo
30W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jose Moreno
38W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Herrera
42W–44L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
LARRY MELENDEZ
34W–23L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nicholas Roacho
77W–58L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Norm Estrada
64W–83L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Recio
10W–9L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ray Bonds
64W–54L career · 31 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steven King
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Trevor Hjalmquist
21W–10L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zaphnath Jaramillo
24W–41L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.