Teams

NBadr (Queens)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-04vs AMinish (Life Time)Split 11
L#1 DoublesNicole Badr / Cynthia Hoover vs Lori DiFazio / Jackie Gyoerkoe6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarissa Bialecki / Stacy Melton vs Julie Dailly / April Minish6-3, 6-2
2023-10-03vs ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#1 DoublesPeggy Hoffman / Abbey Ellis vs Julie Hollifield / Jennifer Little3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNicole Badr / Cynthia Hoover vs Erin Roach / Amanda Cheek7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2023-09-20vs AChristie (PPRSC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesPeggy Hoffman / Cynthia Hoover vs Karin Britt / Nanci Weil6-0, 6-0
2023-09-13vs LCulp/SDeVries (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesPeggy Hoffman / Cynthia Hoover vs Briana Ferraro / Rosanne Sullivan6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Emily McEwen vs Anne Morgan / Lauren Culp6-1, 6-4
2023-09-11vs CArevalo/DMaguire (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Peggy Hoffman vs Mary McGarvey / Arienne Conroy3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNicole Badr / Cynthia Hoover vs Yin Han / Lillie Renbarger6-1, 7-6
2023-09-06vs ERoach/SJPragasam (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#1 DoublesPeggy Hoffman / Cynthia Hoover vs Erin Roach / Jennifer Little6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Morgan Simon vs Garland Neal / Kate Loor6-3, 6-2
2023-08-23vs CMiles (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicole Badr / Cynthia Hoover vs Caitlin Steele / Chivonne Hunter6-4, 6-3
2023-08-16vs AMinish (Life Time)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Peggy Hoffman vs Kristina Cancian / Debbie Alexander6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNicole Badr / Cynthia Hoover vs Lori DiFazio / Kristen FitzGerald6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Peggy Hoffman
published
3.77
Emily McEwen
published 4
3.69
Cynthia Hoover
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.25
Abbey Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Stacy Melton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Joyce Mu
published
2.87
Nicole Badr
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Morgan Simon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Hoover + Nicole Badr8757% games+4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peggy Hoffman
41W–16L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Emily McEwen
20W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Cynthia Hoover
303W–124L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.69
3.5
Abbey Ellis
49W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Stacy Melton
15W–26L career · 1 line in 2023
8%92%1%
3.19
Joyce Mu
14W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Nicole Badr
95W–87L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.87
Morgan Simon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.