Teams

Shields/Fox

2026 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-05vs The Vicious VolliesWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarbara Linke / Helen Shepherd vs Carol Humphrey / Dannielle Freeman6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDina Esterowitz / Cathy Officer vs Mekkla Thompson / Mary Shawhan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Shields / Marla LaHaye vs Lisa Scott / Bennie Blackley6-1, 6-0
2026-07-25vs Fabulous 55'sWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarbara Linke / Vicki Gramil vs Heather Herman / Jennifer Murduck6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Smith / Dana MacHer vs Sue Fisher / Pamela Dean6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarla LaHaye / Cathy Officer vs Brita Robinson / Buthaina Shukri4-6, 2-6
2026-07-20vs The Vicious VolliesWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Linke / Vicki Gramil vs Angela Parker / Carol Humphrey6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDana MacHer / Helen Shepherd vs Lisa Scott / Julie Gowin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarla LaHaye / Cathy Officer vs Teri Hudson / Kathy Crowley6-2, 6-4
2026-06-30vs Fabulous 55'sWon 21
L#1 DoublesSimone Feldman / Laura Smith vs Jennifer Murduck / Heather Herman2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDina Esterowitz / Helen Shepherd vs Pamela Dean / Carol Besse6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDONNA FOX / Cathy Shields vs Shelena Sanderson / Buthaina Shukri7-5, 6-4
2026-06-25vs The Vicious VolliesWon 30
W#1 DoublesSimone Feldman / Helen Shepherd vs Teri Hudson / Bennie Blackley6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDina Esterowitz / Caryn Vollmer vs Angela Parker / Mary Shawhan6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Shields / Marla LaHaye vs Janette O Logan / Dannielle Freeman6-2, 6-0
2026-06-11vs Fabulous 55'sWon 30
W#1 DoublesSimone Feldman / Laura Smith vs Leslie Baird / Caroline Cerniglia6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDina Esterowitz / Caryn Vollmer vs Sue Fisher / Buthaina Shukri6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Shields / Susan Claggett vs Pamela Dean / Diane Sweeney6-2, 6-2
2026-05-12vs The Vicious VolliesWon 21
W#1 DoublesBarbara Linke / Caryn Vollmer vs Heather Sine / Carolyn Greis6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDONNA FOX / Vicki Gramil vs Mekkla Thompson / Mary Shawhan6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCathy Shields / Susan Claggett vs Janette O Logan / Carol Humphrey6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-09vs Fabulous 55'sLost 02
L#2 DoublesCathy Shields / Vicki Gramil vs Carol Besse / Leslie Baird6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarla LaHaye / Cathy Officer vs Shelena Sanderson / Brita Robinson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Shields/Fox7118613145
2Fabulous 55's5316819190

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Caryn Vollmer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.37
Barbara Linke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.32
Vicki Gramil
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.23
Simone Feldman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Cathy Shields
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 4.5
4.21
Dina Esterowitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Dana MacHer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Helen Shepherd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.10
DONNA FOX
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.01
Marla LaHaye
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Cathy Officer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Laura Smith
published
Susan Claggett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marla LaHaye + Cathy Officer7552% games+0.9% vs expected
Vicki Gramil + Marla LaHaye2447% gamesnot enough data
Vicki Gramil + Barbara Linke404 matchesnot enough data
DONNA FOX + Cathy Shields224 matchesnot enough data
Dina Esterowitz + Caryn Vollmer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caryn Vollmer
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
4.48
4.5
Barbara Linke
68W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Vicki Gramil
47W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
Simone Feldman
78W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Cathy Shields
19W–12L career · 13 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Dina Esterowitz
53W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Dana MacHer
90W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Helen Shepherd
26W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
DONNA FOX
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Marla LaHaye
63W–83L career · 5 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Cathy Officer
27W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
3.91
Laura Smith
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Claggett
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.