Teams

MC RED

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 3.79 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-15vs NJ BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmily Webre / Cindy Middleton vs Diana Beck / Diana Guettlein6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSharon Dahlquist / Sharon Naylor vs Caryn Moller / Angela Harper6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-08vs PH GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Webre / Sue McGee vs Christin Johnson / Ming Hall2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Middleton / Kristina Eklund vs Melodie Harris / Anne Reese6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSharon Naylor / Sharon Dahlquist vs Summer Kusel / Rebecca Grace3-4
2023-06-01vs LEBTC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesKristina Eklund / Cindy Middleton vs Tiffany Gerken / Courtney Carignan0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Dahlquist / Emily Webre vs Lisa McGavern / Kelly Lessman3-6, 3-6
2023-05-25vs RHCC PINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesJaime Stokes / Sue McGee vs Sally Landmark / Laura Caldwell4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Middleton / Kristina Eklund vs Nancy Progar / Liz Lautrup4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Naylor / Sharon Dahlquist vs Elizabeth Grevengoed / Stephanie Joens1-6, 0-6
2023-05-11vs NJ REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesJaime Stokes / Sue McGee vs Jessica Mitchell / Lauren Rivas6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Cindy Middleton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.86
Sue McGee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Emily Webre
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jaime Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Sharon Naylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Kristina Eklund
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Sharon Dahlquist
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Middleton + Kristina Eklund123 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Stokes + Sue McGee033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Middleton
34W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Sue McGee
12W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Emily Webre
59W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Jaime Stokes
29W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Sharon Naylor
56W–72L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Kristina Eklund
14W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Sharon Dahlquist
27W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.