Teams

Hamburg Racquet Club-Joseph

2021 18&Over Men · 3.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-20vs The NetworkLost 02
L#2 DoublesVincent Lotempio / George Socco vs James Sauer / Bruce Kinyon6-7, 1-4
L#2 SinglesRagul Navaneethan vs Jason Galbraith3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-07-14vs MeatballsWon 21
W#1 DoublesPratyush Sunkara / Vincent Lotempio vs Yan Chen / Jun Wei6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRagul Navaneethan vs Udeme Ukutt6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTerrence McKelvey / George Socco vs Jason Hernandez / Michael Badger4-6, 2-6
2021-07-06vs Buff: The Outside CrewLost 12
W#1 DoublesPratyush Sunkara / Vincent Lotempio vs Haiyou Wang / Michael Niu6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRagul Navaneethan vs Anthony Yates1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTerrence McKelvey / George Socco vs Yijun Cheng / Evan Roth1-6, 2-6
2021-06-30vs MeatballsLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Walker / George Socco vs Yan Chen / Jun Wei2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVincent Lotempio / Alexander Duffy vs Souma Chowdhury / Mostafa Nouh3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesRagul Navaneethan vs Mark Fanton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-29vs The NetworkSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPratyush Sunkara / Vincent Lotempio vs Bruce Kinyon / James Sauer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRagul Navaneethan vs Donald Lofaso6-3, 4-5
2021-06-07vs Buff: The Outside CrewLost 02
L#1 DoublesVincent Lotempio / Alexander Duffy vs Jason Niu / Jonathan Willard3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Walker / Ragul Navaneethan vs Haiyou Wang / Chucko Mu4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Buff: The Outside Crew06151227225
2Meatballs06151328238
3The Network06151230255
4Hamburg Racquet Club-Joseph06111940280

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
George Socco
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Alexander Duffy
published 3
Jason Joseph
published
Ragul Navaneethan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Vincent Lotempio
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
George Socco
26W–34L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Alexander Duffy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jason Joseph
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Ragul Navaneethan
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Vincent Lotempio
32W–24L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.