Teams

SoCal/Barraquio/18&Over4.0M

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD · SD - Men - 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-04vs SD 4.0 Mtn View (3:2)/ ReyesWon 10
W#1 DoublesEric Bowers / Charles Hamori vs Joseph Reyes / Jeffrey Steen6-2, 6-1
2023-06-04vs SD 4.0 PBTC (2@11AM:3) / MaurizWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / John Carter vs Steve Sanders / Zachary Mayfield6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSakda Kethdy / Jamie Armstrong vs Aram Hosseini / Teppei Karasawa6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / John Carter vs Daniel Henry Schwartzman / Kevin Dudley6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Lin / Charles Hamori vs Daniel Riding / Prashanth Vijayaraghavan6-3, 6-1
2023-04-30vs SD 4.0 LJTC (2:3)/ WattonLost 01
L#1 SinglesJoseph Barraquio vs Matt Szen4-6, 2-6
2023-04-23vs SD 4.0 Lake Murray (3:2)/ HillSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / John Carter vs M Edelson / Seth Hill7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJeff Lin / Sakda Kethdy vs Steve Gerard / Dwight Chen3-6, 4-6
2023-04-16vs SD 4.0 Balboa TC (2:3)/ NguyenWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharles Hamori / Jamie Armstrong vs Ali Moosa / Aayush Khurana6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-02vs SD 4.0 CTC/ CHS (3:2)/ PennWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoseph Barraquio / Andre Archilla vs Theodore Gilmore / Joe Economou6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSakda Kethdy / Paul Minifee vs Will Roth / Jeffrey Newton6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Eric Bowers
published
4.02
Joseph Barraquio
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.84
Jeff Lin
published
3.76
Sakda Kethdy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Charles Hamori
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Paul Minifee
published
Francisco Loayza
published
Jeff Harris
published
Vincent Travaglione
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sakda Kethdy + Joseph Barraquio6746% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Bowers
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
4.12
4.5
Joseph Barraquio
100W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
Jeff Lin
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Sakda Kethdy
75W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Charles Hamori
132W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Paul Minifee
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Francisco Loayza
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeff Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vincent Travaglione
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.