Teams

KTC Stout

2025 OH OV FALL A18&O Daytime · 3.5W Monday

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Veronica Smallwood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Georgianne Lowman
published 3.5
3.47
Rachel Tritz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Angela Mwandia
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Shanelle Witting
published
3.39
NATALIE PHILLIPS
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Lisa Yates
published
3.38
Elizabeth Oakley
published 3.5
3.31
Ashley O'Hara
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Jan Wineberg
published
3.30
Noreen Beiersdorfer
published
3.20
Robyn Bittner
published
3.18
Beth Wiedemann
published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Wendling
published 3.5
3.15
Tami Stout
published
3.14
Zina Williams
published
2.98
Kim Gilbert
published
2.97
Jennifer Letavec
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Veronica Smallwood + Elizabeth Oakley5166% games+23.3% vs expected
NATALIE PHILLIPS + Veronica Smallwood7070% games+20.6% vs expected
Georgianne Lowman + Elizabeth Oakley19472% games+11.1% vs expected
Lisa Yates + Shanelle Witting17363% games+8.3% vs expected
Angela Mwandia + Ashley O'Hara8261% games+8.3% vs expected
Rachel Tritz + NATALIE PHILLIPS7362% games+8.0% vs expected
Jennifer Letavec + Veronica Smallwood6259% games+7.4% vs expected
Jan Wineberg + Ashley O'Hara5155% games+6.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Veronica Smallwood
164W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
3.5
Georgianne Lowman
125W–79L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.59
Rachel Tritz
122W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Angela Mwandia
165W–123L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Shanelle Witting
158W–94L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.42
NATALIE PHILLIPS
61W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
Lisa Yates
226W–153L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Elizabeth Oakley
72W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Ashley O'Hara
127W–78L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Jan Wineberg
157W–266L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Noreen Beiersdorfer
134W–78L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Robyn Bittner
57W–47L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Beth Wiedemann
61W–49L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Elizabeth Wendling
51W–33L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
Tami Stout
82W–71L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
Zina Williams
101W–155L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.14
Kim Gilbert
28W–50L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jennifer Letavec
96W–64L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.