Teams

Team 10

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-27vs Team 1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesClaris Brock / Donna Stewart vs Ami Chastain / Greta Davies3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHEATHER HUGHES / Julie Gowin vs Erin Gorman / Heather Sine2-6, 2-6
2022-07-23vs Team 8 in2WIN...we refuse to loseLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Gowin / Tana Jankowiak vs Blanca Shumann / Monica Palacios6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCynthia Pointer vs Sweta Jain0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Yoon / Heather Iasso vs Wendy Li / Paula Garrison3-6, 5-4
2022-07-21vs Team 9 SledgehammersLost 01
L#1 DoublesDonna Stewart / Julie Gowin vs Karen Christian / Elizabeth Lucchesi2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-13vs Team 6 Over Served AGAIN 4.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Mitchum / Julie Gowin vs Kim Leas / Joan-Marie Turchiano6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-09vs Team 5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeather Iasso / Jennifer Yoon vs Jackie Livesay / Kim Ngoc Tran3-6, 4-5
2022-07-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLara Brandes / Claris Brock vs Susan Douglas / Kathleen Kane6-7, 4-4
2022-06-27vs Team 3Lost 01
L#1 DoublesClaris Brock / Donna Stewart vs Stephanie Elsheikh / Melanie Pyle4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Julie Gowin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Shan Wang
published
3.63
Tana Jankowiak
published 4
3.46
Claris Brock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Donna Stewart
published 3.5
3.20
Jennifer Yoon
published
3.08
Cynthia Pointer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
HEATHER HUGHES
published 3
3.01
Heather Iasso
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lara Brandes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

HEATHER HUGHES + Heather Iasso3353% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julie Gowin
227W–211L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Shan Wang
31W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Tana Jankowiak
103W–71L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
3.5
Claris Brock
420W–275L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Donna Stewart
36W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jennifer Yoon
16W–23L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Cynthia Pointer
106W–128L career · 1 line in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
HEATHER HUGHES
52W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Heather Iasso
175W–157L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.01
Lara Brandes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.