Teams

Lawing/Hocker/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-24vs Rutherford/NashvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Megan McDugald vs Nancy Rutherford / Janet Barber4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesRyan Sedlacek vs Lauren Murphy3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKelly Stanley / Lauren Cannon vs Misty Holladay / Laura Murak1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaelin Cramer / Megan de la O vs Annie Adler / Virginia Mazzoni0-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesLauren Hocker / Rachel Stevenson vs Keri Cowles / Emily Walker2-6, 3-6
2026-04-17vs Fisher/Burton/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Kaelin Cramer vs Amy Kocian / Mary Katherine Seibels6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMegan de la O vs Dana Hipp2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Hocker / Suzanne Lawing vs Melissa Burton / Anne Rogers1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Stanley / Ellen Hollis vs Holly Fisher / Erica Stepanishen2-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesLauren Kingman / Sara Beth Scott vs Brooke Vane / Brooke Keane6-4, 6-4
2026-04-03vs Frame/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Centers / Kate Mikes vs Cindy Chaffin / Beth Frame2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Enstice vs Shannon Fox4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Farrow / Ellen Hollis vs Autumn Brown / Tarah Troost1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Cannon / Lauren Hocker vs Myrvete Korenberg / Amanda Anderson2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesKaelin Cramer / Ryan Sedlacek vs Jacqueline Marshall / Julie LaLance2-6, 2-6
2026-03-27vs Keenan/Bennett/NashvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLauren Kingman / Sara Beth Scott vs Lauren Boyce / Kathy Logan1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Hocker / Megan McDugald vs Stacey Wade / Carol Stansbury7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCaroline Weigel / Elizabeth Centers vs Beth Patrizio / Karen Pillans1-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesSuzanne Lawing / Kelly Stanley vs Carolyn Slandzicki / Joni Jestings1-6, 3-6
2026-03-20vs Shalk/Caputo/NashvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMegan McDugald / Traci Gilbert-Stafford vs Preeti Arla / Ashley Johnson4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLauren Kingman / Caroline Weigel vs Tanya Petrucha / Kathryn Hanson1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSara Beth Scott / Ryan Sedlacek vs April Bosse / Margaret Lovelette6-3, 6-3
W#4 DoublesMegan de la O / Kaelin Cramer vs Doreen Caputo / Sara White6-2, 6-2
2026-03-13vs Baumgatner/Collins/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Megan McDugald vs Erica Collins / Dianne Davenport2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Sedlacek vs Jennifer Brinks3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRuby Elshafei / Suzanne Lawing vs Judith Gallagher / Jill Byrum6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Kingman / Sarah Enstice vs Christa Gonzales / Sarah MacIntyre6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#4 DoublesRachel Stevenson / Kate Mikes vs Mindy Higgins / Nicki Robins1-6, 3-6
2026-03-12vs Fisher/Burton/NashvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Megan de la O vs Jackie McDonald / Anne Rogers6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaige Adair / Ruby Elshafei vs Breigh Chadwick / Amy Kocian4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Lawing / Lauren Cannon vs Julie Wilson / Brooke Vane6-2, 6-3
W#4 DoublesJill Farrow / Ellen Hollis vs Resha Blivens / Melinda Norris-Munro4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-06vs Rutherford/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesTraci Gilbert-Stafford / Megan McDugald vs Cheryl Byrd / Nita Hollis6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLauren Hocker vs Lauren Murphy4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMegan de la O / Kaelin Cramer vs Janet Barber / Kimberly Jones0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Kingman / Paige Adair vs Keri Cowles / Lindsey Murrell2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#4 DoublesKelly Stanley / Sarah Enstice vs Barb Morris / Beth Molteni6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Paige Adair
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Megan McDugald
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.20
Ruby Elshafei
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Traci Gilbert-Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.15
Kate Mikes
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Kelly Stanley
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Sarah Enstice
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.04
Suzanne Lawing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.03
Lauren Kingman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.96
Jill Farrow
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Elizabeth Centers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Ryan Sedlacek
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Kaelin Cramer
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #4 Doubles 22% · published
2.86
Megan de la O
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
2.83
Sara Beth Scott
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Lauren Hocker
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Caroline Weigel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Ellen Hollis
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Beth Scott + Ryan Sedlacek3350% games+4.3% vs expected
Sara Beth Scott + Lauren Kingman5256% games+3.4% vs expected
Megan de la O + Traci Gilbert-Stafford9850% games+0.4% vs expected
Kaelin Cramer + Traci Gilbert-Stafford6749% games+0.0% vs expected
Megan McDugald + Kaelin Cramer6551% games−0.1% vs expected
Lauren Kingman + Ryan Sedlacek3248% games−3.0% vs expected
Suzanne Lawing + Lauren Hocker1434% games−6.8% vs expected
Megan de la O + Kaelin Cramer3245% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Adair
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Megan McDugald
18W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Ruby Elshafei
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Traci Gilbert-Stafford
32W–34L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Kate Mikes
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Kelly Stanley
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Sarah Enstice
28W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.09
Suzanne Lawing
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Lauren Kingman
25W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.03
Jill Farrow
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Elizabeth Centers
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93
Ryan Sedlacek
12W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Kaelin Cramer
30W–25L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Megan de la O
21W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Sara Beth Scott
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
2.83
Lauren Hocker
17W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Caroline Weigel
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ellen Hollis
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.