Teams

KY/LEX/Gordon

2025 USTA FALL LEAGUE 40 & Over · 3.0 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-12vs KY/LEX/Walbrohns/AlbrechtLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Fakharpour / Tina Smith vs April Russell / Lee Walker2-6, 1-6
2025-12-07vs KY/LEX/SimpsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Fakharpour / Niki Moss vs Sally Kiel / Charing Kelsey4-6, 2-6
2025-11-20vs KY/LEX/SimpsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne West / Allyson Foster vs Rhonda Hilton / Amy Schenck2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesNiki Moss vs Elizabeth Doss0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGloria Hehl / Charlotte Nickerson vs Diana Simpson / Noriko Hosoda6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-11-06vs KY/LEX/Walbrohns/AlbrechtLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllyson Foster / Mary Fakharpour vs Leah Lykins / Dana Gerken1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTina Smith / Gloria Hehl vs April Russell / Jill Niemi5-7, 1-6
2025-10-27vs KY/LEX/SimpsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesNatalie Avant / Niki Moss vs Rhonda Hilton / Amy Schenck4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCharlotte Nickerson vs Elizabeth Doss1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGloria Hehl / Tina Smith vs Noriko Hosoda / Miho Stepka3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Anne West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Natalie Avant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Kristyn Gordon
published
2.29
Niki Moss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.24
Charlotte Nickerson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.01
Allyson Foster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Gloria Hehl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Fakharpour
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tina Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne West
36W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Natalie Avant
4W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Kristyn Gordon
6W–19L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
Niki Moss
14W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
3
Charlotte Nickerson
12W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.24
2.5
Allyson Foster
8W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Gloria Hehl
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Fakharpour
3W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Smith
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.