Teams

MVCC RED

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-31vs BVP GREENLost 02
L#1 SinglesRyan Moss vs Ari Krichiver1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeremy Carman / Antonio Vigil vs Peter Choi / Thuan Phan2-6, 3-6
2026-05-30vs NJ GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesNickolas Spinks / Brandon Frawley vs Matt Farling / Kenton Wride3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRyan Moss vs Brett Vladika2-6
L#2 DoublesJeremy Carman / Daniel Merrell vs Greg Fisher / Per Westholm3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAntonio Vigil / Chris McFarlin vs Corey Bagley / Bradley Jessen6-7, 3-6
2026-05-22vs BP REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesBarry Mendeloff / Daniel Merrell vs Brian Dino / Jeffrey Greenberg2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Moss vs Reed McCoy7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrew Adams / Paul Clancy vs Phillip Heyser / Michael Richmond4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesWill Huddleston vs Joe Hendricks2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAntonio Vigil / Chris McFarlin vs Damon Graham-Haradon / Mitch Dickman6-3, 6-3
2026-05-13vs MC GREENLost 05
L#1 DoublesBarry Mendeloff / Brandon Frawley vs Matthew Williams / Patrick Martin4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Moss vs Bryan Racz6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeremy Carman / Daniel Merrell vs Douglas Wong / David Bailey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAntonio Vigil vs Martijn Letteboer0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWill Huddleston / Paul Clancy vs Glen Todd / Rom van der Zee3-6, 2-6
2026-04-29vs RHCC REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesTravis Ervick / Nickolas Spinks vs Matthew Joens / Michael Warren3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesBarry Mendeloff vs Ryan Miller4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBrandon Frawley / Daniel Merrell vs Ryan Wither / Daniel Rabbitt2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJeremy Carman vs Kip Cranford3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Adams / Paul Clancy vs Dayton Kellenberger / Richard Farquhar6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-04-22vs MC REDLost 12
W#1 SinglesRyan Moss vs David Cooperstein7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesWill Huddleston / Jeremy Carman vs Adam Kemp / Jacob Hargreaves5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBrandon Frawley vs Thomas Bernhardt0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-15vs LTC-M NAVYLost 14
L#1 DoublesTravis Ervick / Nickolas Spinks vs Benoit Cauwe / Mike Salisbury7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRyan Moss vs Colin John2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeremy Carman / Barry Mendeloff vs Jonathan Liauw / Dmitry Vygodner1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesBrandon Frawley vs George Burton6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAndrew Adams / Will Huddleston vs Seon Y Shin / Kurt Bulawa2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MC BRONZE7031412156
2DTC NAVY7029617241
3BTA-F YELLOW52221331260
4SS-H GREY52211433307
5PCRK YELLOW52211435303
6SKY SILVER52191638305
7MEA ORANGE43142147333
8KC-RH SILVER34142145335
9CACM GREY34152047346
10CCC PURPLE25171843330
11LTA-Q YELLOW25142147351
12GPTC BLUE2582761385
13BM ORANGE16132247352
14MVCC RED0652551330
15KC-RH GOLD0713468407

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Chris McFarlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Paul Clancy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Brandon Frawley
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Antonio Vigil
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.60
Jeremy Carman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.60
Nickolas Spinks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Daniel Merrell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.50
Barry Mendeloff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.48
Will Huddleston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.45
Andrew Adams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.17
Ryan Moss
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Travis Ervick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nickolas Spinks + Travis Ervick1445% games−2.2% vs expected
Antonio Vigil + Jeremy Carman2541% games−5.5% vs expected
Chris McFarlin + Barry Mendeloff134 matchesnot enough data
Antonio Vigil + Chris McFarlin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris McFarlin
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Paul Clancy
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Brandon Frawley
8W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Antonio Vigil
7W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Jeremy Carman
8W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Nickolas Spinks
3W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Daniel Merrell
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Barry Mendeloff
7W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Will Huddleston
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.48
4
Andrew Adams
1W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
Ryan Moss
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.17
Travis Ervick
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.