Teams

3-TTed-Eno

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women-Evening

9 players · average NTRP 4.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Ahlquist / Brandy Kmiec vs Karen Griffin / Jennifer McEntee7-6, 6-3
2022-04-19vs 1-ESpeicher-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesLisa Spees vs Alex Thai6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Ahlquist / Brandy Kmiec vs Allison Ostrander / Emily Tinervin6-1, 6-1
2022-04-12vs 2-HRemley-Eno-5.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hiller / Tanita Tedamrongwanish vs Logan Shapiro / Mary-Katherine Martin4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPaige Lloyd / Brandy Kmiec vs Karen Griffin / Charlie Trinco3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-29vs 1-ESpeicher-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Spees / Tanita Tedamrongwanish vs Allison Ostrander / Lorraine Bowen6-2, 6-3
2022-03-22vs 2-HRemley-Eno-5.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Ahlquist / Lindsey Moore vs Leslie Boesch / Logan Shapiro3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-14vs 1-ESpeicher-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Ahlquist / Lisa Spees vs Elizabeth Speicher / Heidi Steiber2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTanita Tedamrongwanish vs Lorraine Bowen6-4, 6-3
2022-03-01vs 2-HRemley-Eno-5.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Spees / Tanita Tedamrongwanish vs Kelly Moler Glass / Heather Remley5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Jennifer Hiller
published
4.70
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 5
4.54
Ivette Duran
published 5
4.43
Michelle Ahlquist
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.40
Betsy Shoffner
published 4.5
4.35
MacY Fisher
published
4.34
Brandy Kmiec
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.34
Lisa Spees
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
Paige Lloyd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandy Kmiec + Michelle Ahlquist12759% games+5.6% vs expected
Betsy Shoffner + Michelle Ahlquist8265% games+2.9% vs expected
Tanita Tedamrongwanish + Lisa Spees3351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hiller
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
4.93
5
Tanita Tedamrongwanish
179W–94L career · 10 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.70
5
Ivette Duran
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
4.54
4.5
Michelle Ahlquist
130W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
4.43
4.5
Betsy Shoffner
98W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
4.40
MacY Fisher
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
4.35
4.5
Brandy Kmiec
107W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Lisa Spees
97W–62L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
4.34
Paige Lloyd
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.