Teams

CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-09-27vs BROOKSIDE CW7.5AWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalie Geyer / Aiko Murakami vs Spera Georgiou / Shari Day6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Pham / Chie Imperato vs Suzanne Anderson / Laura Leafstrand4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKumiko Takamatsu / Kazue Kadoshima vs Elisapeta Peterson / Kathy Ries6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Yen Le
published
3.66
Amanda Kao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Tammy Choy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Holly Yip
published
3.55
Mary Pham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Delphine Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Wanda Soon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Lora Saarnio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Aiko Murakami
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Linda Suk
published
Analiza Dolor
published 3.5
3.24
Chie Imperato
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Kumiko Takamatsu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Wendy Kawamoto
published
3.13
Madhumita Datta
published
3.06
Izumi Yaskawa
published
3.04
Kazue Kadoshima
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
May Chee
published
Natalie Geyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chie Imperato + Kazue Kadoshima044 matchesnot enough data
Kazue Kadoshima + Kumiko Takamatsu123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yen Le
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Amanda Kao
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Tammy Choy
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Holly Yip
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Mary Pham
8W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Delphine Hill
6W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Wanda Soon
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
Lora Saarnio
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
Aiko Murakami
32W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Linda Suk
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
3.5
Analiza Dolor
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Chie Imperato
3W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Kumiko Takamatsu
7W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Wendy Kawamoto
6W–23L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Madhumita Datta
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Izumi Yaskawa
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kazue Kadoshima
1W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
May Chee
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Natalie Geyer
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.