← Teams

STAC-Davis

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

2 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Colleen Sharkey
published 4.5
4.09
Chanel Nielsen
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 4.5
Results8 ties
2021-11-20Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesChanel Nielsen / John Doane vs Nicole Wilson / Nick Jarvis7-5, 6-1
2021-11-20Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesChanel Nielsen / John Doane vs Terra Yara / Andrew Timmons4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-11-14Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJohn Doane / Chanel Nielsen vs Nick Moxley / Angela Byrum6-1, 6-2
2021-10-24Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Loi Crawford vs Jennifer Smith / Michael Schuster6-0, 6-4
2021-10-16Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesCurtis Medved / Chanel Nielsen vs Christopher Engelmann / Terra Yara7-6, 6-2
2021-10-10Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesCurtis Medved / Chanel Nielsen vs Mark Mettler / Natalia Devore6-2, 6-4
2021-10-09Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesHam Kang / Chanel Nielsen vs Michael Schuster / Melanie Redding6-2, 6-4
2021-10-02Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesChanel Nielsen / Curtis Medved vs Richard Deitz / Sarah Johnston6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Colleen Sharkey
65W–49L career
2%98%0%
4.10
4.5
Chanel Nielsen
244W–118L career
3%97%0%
4.09

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.