Teams

Cownie & Oiler: Life Time

2026 IA 40 & Over Adult League · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-06vs Lu & Richards: GenesisLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Anania / Erin Braunger vs Shirley Weuve / Emilie Pohlman2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesHolli Keshwani vs Dionne Richards6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Rude / Michele van Vark vs Christine Halbrook / Val Hoefle4-6, 3-6
2025-10-31vs IA/Wilker-Everett/40&Over3.0WLost 13
L#1 DoublesChristy Cownie / Sara Peterson vs Ann Mincks / Jill Liebe6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHolly Adams vs Joy Li1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Oiler / Jessica Scuffham vs Kayla Bond / Kelly Brown Gross2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Brennan / Carolyn Rude vs Laurine Raker / Deborah Fleagle6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-11vs Smith: NDACWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristy Cownie / Holli Keshwani vs Sonja Smith / Gilbey Strub6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRenee Oiler / Jessica Scuffham vs Kathy Jenkins / Elisha Horsfall2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Anania / Holly Adams vs Kelly Bedeian / Christine McLaughlin6-4, 6-3
2025-10-04vs Everett & Hales: DMGCCLost 04
L#1 DoublesStephanie Anania / Renee Oiler vs Cheryl Minor / Michelle Mullin1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHolli Keshwani vs Christen Bliss4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChristy Cownie / Tricia Drake vs Brenda Klein / Mary Everett6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Rude / Jessica Scuffham vs Allison Hales / Anna DeWaay2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Wilker-Everett/40&Over3.0W4118722179
2Smith: NDAC41141125198
3Everett & Hales: DMGCC3216923189
4Norris: Smithfield22101023171
5Lu & Richards: Genesis1481735237
6Cownie & Oiler: Life Time0441633213

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Christy Cownie
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Holli Keshwani
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Sara Peterson
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.78
Stephanie Anania
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #4 Doubles 29% · published
2.77
Michele van Vark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dalim Young
published 3
2.69
Renee Oiler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Holly Adams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.63
Erin Braunger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Carolyn Rude
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.39
Jessica Scuffham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Brennan
published
Tricia Drake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Scuffham + Renee Oiler224 matchesnot enough data
Renee Oiler + Holli Keshwani314 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Scuffham + Christy Cownie213 matchesnot enough data
Christy Cownie + Sara Peterson033 matchesnot enough data
Christy Cownie + Holli Keshwani303 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Anania + Holly Adams213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christy Cownie
23W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Holli Keshwani
29W–23L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Sara Peterson
10W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Stephanie Anania
41W–35L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Michele van Vark
18W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Dalim Young
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Renee Oiler
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Holly Adams
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
Erin Braunger
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Carolyn Rude
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Jessica Scuffham
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Michelle Brennan
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tricia Drake
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.