Teams

Mona's Team

2023 Springfield Adult Flex Leagues · Women's Tri-Level Flex League

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-05vs Trish's TeamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTricia Denzer / Sharon Bennett vs Kelly Mueller / Kathy Crouthers6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristina Waugh / Tami Murphy vs Leslie Echols / Karen Griffin6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-26vs Trish's TeamWon 10
W#3 DoublesLorry Brown / Tricia Denzer vs Karen Griffin / Kimberly Mitrenga7-6, 6-1
2023-02-19vs Trish's TeamLost 02
L#2 DoublesChristina Waugh / Lorry Brown vs Carol Rollins / Kimberly Mitrenga5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTami Murphy / Tricia Denzer vs Leslie Echols / Karen Griffin4-6, 4-6
2023-02-12vs Trish's TeamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Waugh / Sharon Bennett vs Leslie Echols / Patricia Musick4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMona Palmer / Jane Gardner vs Cheryl Ballou / Karen Griffin6-2, 6-4
2023-02-05vs Trish's TeamLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristina Waugh / Mona Palmer vs Cheryl Ballou / Leslie Echols2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLorry Brown / Caroline Farouki vs Kelly Mueller / Debbie Pell5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJane Gardner / Tami Murphy vs Carol Rollins / Karen Griffin6-0, 6-1
2023-01-29vs Trish's TeamWon 10
W#3 DoublesLorry Brown / Tricia Denzer vs Carol Rollins / Kimberly Mitrenga7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women's Tri-Level Flex League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mona's Team4212613127
2Trish's Team2461226189

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christina Waugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.34
Tami Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.01
Jane Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Caroline Farouki
published
Lorry Brown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mona Palmer
published
Sharon Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Tricia Denzer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorry Brown + Tricia Denzer9656% games−9.1% vs expected
Tricia Denzer + Tami Murphy134 matchesnot enough data
Lorry Brown + Tami Murphy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Waugh
0W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tami Murphy
79W–55L career · 7 lines in 2023
89%11%<1%
3.34
Jane Gardner
57W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
Caroline Farouki
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lorry Brown
38W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mona Palmer
34W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Bennett
15W–5L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tricia Denzer
24W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.