Teams

Fall Dreaming Scrappers (Ron Ehmann)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Fall Day · 4.0 Adult Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.09 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Estefania Lacoa
published 4.5
4.12
Carin Blanchard
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.08
Maria Hulett
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.04
Britta Reinhardt Moser
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.93
Suzanne Siegler
published
3.91
Leslie Stein
published
Claudia Viso
published 4
3.71
Beth Pritchett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Maria Jose Jorquera
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
3.65
Sandra Bazain
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Amy Kanarios
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Maria Brozzi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
3.30
Esther Surujon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carin Blanchard + Maria Hulett684456% games+1.4% vs expected
Sandra Bazain + Estefania Lacoa81147% games−0.3% vs expected
Maria Jose Jorquera + Amy Kanarios5651% games−7.3% vs expected
Maria Hulett + Sandra Bazain9360% gamesnot enough data
Carin Blanchard + Estefania Lacoa224 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Bazain + Maria Jose Jorquera134 matchesnot enough data
Carin Blanchard + Sandra Bazain213 matchesnot enough data
Carin Blanchard + Maria Jose Jorquera123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Estefania Lacoa
239W–119L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Carin Blanchard
207W–149L career · 7 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Maria Hulett
182W–138L career · 7 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Britta Reinhardt Moser
92W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
4.04
Suzanne Siegler
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.93
Leslie Stein
28W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.91
4
Claudia Viso
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Beth Pritchett
97W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Maria Jose Jorquera
146W–116L career · 14 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.67
4
Sandra Bazain
243W–156L career · 5 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Amy Kanarios
112W–92L career · 6 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Maria Brozzi
152W–217L career · 3 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
4
Elizabeth Gonzalez
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Esther Surujon
62W–121L career · 1 line in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.