Teams

SPTC Holliday 2.5 40

2026 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 2.5 W Sat (3 cts)

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-07vs Bardmoor 2.5 40Split 11
L#1 DoublesKathy Wallen / Angela Walker vs Patricia Lenz / Randee Carl0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMinh D Le vs Amy Mangueira6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2026-06-03vs Bardmoor 2.5 40Split 11
W#1 DoublesMinh D Le / Kathy Wallen vs Amy Mangueira / Patricia Timmerman6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMarcia Crawley / Laura Conley vs Randee Carl / Maureen Ellison3-6, 0-6
2026-05-30vs Bardmoor 2.5 40Split 11
L#1 DoublesMinh D Le / Laura Conley vs Christina Bordeaux / Maureen Ellison6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Wallen / Angela Walker vs Emily Lischer / Patricia Lenz6-3, 6-1
2026-05-09vs Bardmoor 2.5 40Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Wallen / Minh D Le vs Christina Bordeaux / Randee Carl6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-02vs Bardmoor 2.5 40Split 11
L#1 DoublesKathy Wallen / Angela Walker vs Patricia Lenz / Randee Carl2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMinh D Le vs Amy Mangueira7-5, 6-3
2026-04-18vs Bardmoor 2.5 40Split 11
W#1 DoublesKathy Wallen / Angela Walker vs Christina Bordeaux / Patricia Lenz6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMarcia Crawley vs Amy Mangueira0-6, 0-6
2026-04-11vs Bardmoor 2.5 40Split 11
L#1 DoublesStephanie Rossman / Minh D Le vs Christina Bordeaux / Amy Mangueira6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAngela Walker / Kathy Wallen vs Patricia Lenz / Emily Lischer7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 W Sat (3 cts)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SPTC Holliday 2.5 4043111021156
2Bardmoor 2.5 4034101125178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Eugene Holliday
published 4
2.39
Minh D Le
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.36
Kathy Wallen
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Amy Braswell
published 2.5
2.24
Stephanie Rossman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Angela Walker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
1.90
Marcia Crawley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Walker + Kathy Wallen3251% games−4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eugene Holliday
7W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Minh D Le
6W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.39
Kathy Wallen
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Amy Braswell
no matches on record · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Rossman
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Angela Walker
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Marcia Crawley
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.