Teams

CTL55/Connare/RK

Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 & Over Adult Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-21vs CTL55/Andrews/HBWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnn Marie Mims / Pamela Scott vs Jayne Woodward / Rita Anderson5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCarleen Smoak / Natalie O'Bradovich vs Donna Dabbs / Karen Zobel6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBecky Hunter / Patricia Earle vs Betsy Nunnery / Julie Weinzapfel6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-03-14vs CTL55/CONROY/WWDLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynAnne Knudsen / Natalie O'Bradovich vs Diane Junis / Lari Chillag2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Scott / Ann Marie Mims vs Libba Shrader / Katie McDougall6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Earle / Becky Hunter vs Linda Woodard / Suzanne Frame0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesCaroline Connare / Ann Marie Mims vs Anne Belue / Anne Draffin5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBecky Hunter / Natalie O'Bradovich vs Cheryl Hartvigsen / Juanita Cooney3-6, 1-6
2026-02-28vs CTL55/Mosley/GVWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatricia Earle / LynAnne Knudsen vs Theresa Moore / Fanni Simmons6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNatalie O'Bradovich / Lyssa Fisher vs Jacqueline Jacobs / Doris Mosley4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-14vs CTL55/PENCE/PKWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaroline Connare / Pamela Scott vs Dorroh Hamlett / Susan Pence6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLyssa Fisher / Ann Marie Mims vs Regina York / Pamela Day6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-02-07vs CTL55/Allen/PKWon 21
L#1 DoublesPamela Scott / Patricia Earle vs Diana Motlong / Marie Aimone2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCarleen Smoak / Lyssa Fisher vs Karen Patton / M Brinkley5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCaroline Connare / LynAnne Knudsen vs Julie Murphy / Donna Fountain6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Caroline Connare
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
Annie Hightower
published 3
2.71
Ann Marie Mims
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Carleen Smoak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Patricia Earle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.62
Natalie O'Bradovich
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.58
LynAnne Knudsen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Lyssa Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Becky Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Pamela Scott
published
Sallie Noble
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carleen Smoak + Annie Hightower7364% games+17.4% vs expected
Patricia Earle + Annie Hightower3451% games+8.4% vs expected
Patricia Earle + Pamela Scott6455% games+6.7% vs expected
Patricia Earle + Caroline Connare91647% games+4.5% vs expected
LynAnne Knudsen + Natalie O'Bradovich5351% games+2.5% vs expected
Patricia Earle + Lyssa Fisher91145% games+0.1% vs expected
Caroline Connare + Natalie O'Bradovich6749% games−0.9% vs expected
Caroline Connare + LynAnne Knudsen61148% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Connare
138W–122L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Annie Hightower
52W–25L career · type S · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Ann Marie Mims
54W–84L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Carleen Smoak
69W–60L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Patricia Earle
65W–117L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Natalie O'Bradovich
53W–69L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
LynAnne Knudsen
53W–96L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
2.58
Lyssa Fisher
57W–82L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Becky Hunter
55W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Pamela Scott
27W–51L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sallie Noble
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.