Teams

Stemmler/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-07vs Madson/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesJordan Rausch / Madison Fair vs Dianne Garland / Kelly Carter6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLindsey Stone vs Jennifer Cihlar6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRyoko Yamanobe / Meg Stemmler vs Katherine Kirkland / Taylor Duncan6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMaggie Piazza vs Samantha Reilly1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesWhitney Kemp / Katy Miller vs Rochelle Garlow / Daria Sharova4-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Jane Decker
published
2.86
Madison Fair
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Margaret Bourland
published
2.70
Jordan Rausch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Brooke Cibulski
published
2.60
2.56
MARY DALE CROZIER
published
2.42
Charlotte Dolan
published 2.5
2.41
Meg Stemmler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.40
Maggie Piazza
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.39
Lindsey Stone
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.12
Whitney Kemp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ryoko Yamanobe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Stemmler + Margaret Bourland5262% games+20.8% vs expected
Jordan Rausch + Mary Elizabeth Armor3251% games−1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Decker
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Madison Fair
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Margaret Bourland
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Jordan Rausch
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
Brooke Cibulski
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.60
Mary Elizabeth Armor
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.60
MARY DALE CROZIER
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Charlotte Dolan
5W–19L career · no lines in 2025
0%70%30%
2.42
Meg Stemmler
18W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Maggie Piazza
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
Lindsey Stone
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Whitney Kemp
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Ryoko Yamanobe
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.