Teams

One Little Victory - 3.0 18+

2022 18&Over Men · 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-23vs Northern: EnterpriseWon 32
W#1 DoublesJason Cooney / Quentin Phung vs Anton Keller / Christopher Izzo6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesPranav Rao vs Noah Britton3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian LeCours / Michael Nevins vs Kashi Prasad / Girish Ramanathan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Klein vs Max Weissman6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNICHOLAS AMODIO / Edwin Rogers vs Chad Binney / George Koh6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-07-16vs Puma 3.0Won 31
W#1 DoublesQuentin Phung / Jason Cooney vs Brijesh Tantuwaya / Donald Streeter6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesPranav Rao vs Mark Warner6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEdwin Rogers / NICHOLAS AMODIO vs Fred Boehrer / Charles Zarriello5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLuc Belikis vs Raimundo Archibold6-0, 6-1
2022-06-25vs Northern: EnterpriseSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJason Cooney / Michael Nevins vs Aman Mundra / Brent Smith5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Klein vs Noah Britton6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesQuentin Phung / Thomas Gandrud vs Anton Keller / Kannan Narasimhan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNICHOLAS AMODIO / George Polino vs Christopher Izzo / David Giwerc2-6, 7-6
2022-06-18vs Puma 3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesQuentin Phung / George Polino vs Dillon Scribner / Brijesh Tantuwaya3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPranav Rao vs Mark Warner6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Nevins / Edwin Rogers vs Thomas Gadomski / Fred Boehrer1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDaniel Tarantino / Christopher Rust vs Bob Schuman / Jim Best4-6, 1-6
2022-06-05vs Northern: EnterpriseLost 13
L#1 DoublesQuentin Phung / Michael Nevins vs Andrew Mullin / Aman Mundra3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJason Cooney vs Brent Smith3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLuc Belikis / Thomas Gandrud vs Girish Ramanathan / Jeffrey Klamka3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEdwin Rogers / NICHOLAS AMODIO vs Thomas Miller / Rico Amato4-6, 3-6
2022-05-22vs Puma 3.0Won 32
L#1 DoublesJason Cooney / Thomas Gandrud vs Donald Streeter / Brijesh Tantuwaya6-4, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJodi Council vs Mark Warner5-5
W#2 DoublesMichael Nevins / Michael Klein vs Jim Best / Thomas Gadomski6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesLuc Belikis vs Charles Zarriello6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNICHOLAS AMODIO / Edwin Rogers vs Eric Lindh / Bob Schuman6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1One Little Victory - 3.0 18+33131738273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
William Mann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Quentin Phung
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.26
Jason Cooney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Brian LeCours
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.83
Luc Belikis
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Daniel Tarantino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
George Polino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.53
Edwin Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Christopher Rust
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jared Danaher
published
Jodi Council
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Michael Klein
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Michael Nevins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
NICHOLAS AMODIO
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Pranav Rao
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Gandrud
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Quentin Phung + Jason Cooney7172% games+13.1% vs expected
Quentin Phung + Michael Klein2343% games+2.3% vs expected
Edwin Rogers + NICHOLAS AMODIO9847% games−1.1% vs expected
Christopher Rust + George Polino044 matchesnot enough data
NICHOLAS AMODIO + George Polino213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Mann
86W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Quentin Phung
91W–52L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.54
Jason Cooney
42W–20L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Brian LeCours
64W–44L career · type M · 1 line in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
Luc Belikis
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Daniel Tarantino
3W–14L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
George Polino
10W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Edwin Rogers
29W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Christopher Rust
1W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jared Danaher
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jodi Council
10W–23L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Michael Klein
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Nevins
11W–12L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
NICHOLAS AMODIO
17W–16L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Pranav Rao
6W–2L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Gandrud
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.