Teams

Tom Schneider

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over Day · Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-08-09vs GrabillWon 20
W#2 DoublesSteve McCoy / William Bloomquist vs David Ledane / Donald Reuwer6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Barnes / Dennis Weikel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-04vs Thompson 8.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Barnes / David Ponder vs Cliff Bernstein / Tom Somers6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDennis Weikel / Gene Rowland vs Stanley Proser / John Theis0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-07-21vs GrabillWon 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Barnes / William Bloomquist vs Vin Grabill / Stephen Haines4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-12vs Thompson 8.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesDavid Ponder / David Barnes vs David Burnell / David Porter7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Clayt Lemme vs Al Baker / Randall Scott4-6, 1-6
2022-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesSteve McCoy / Dennis Weikel vs David Ledane / Gary Simpler6-2, 6-2
2022-06-21vs GrabillLost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Lionel Whately vs Ted Sholar / Vin Grabill6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-06-16vs Thompson 8.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Lionel Whately vs Francis Kreysa / Stanley Proser3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDavid Ponder / Steve McCoy vs Tom Somers / Cliff Bernstein7-6, 6-3
2022-06-09vs Thompson 8.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Ponder / Steve McCoy vs Tom Somers / Howard Staley6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesClayt Lemme / Dennis Weikel vs John Theis / Stanley Proser5-7, 2-6
2022-05-26vs GrabillWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Bloomquist / Dennis Weikel vs Vin Grabill / John Klyap6-2, 6-2
2022-05-17vs Thompson 8.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesDennis Weikel / David Barnes vs Stanley Proser / John Theis3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSteve McCoy / David Ponder vs Al Baker / Randall Scott6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 65 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Ponder
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Dennis Weikel
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Steve McCoy
published
3.25
William Bloomquist
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jeffrey Decaro
published 3.5
Thomas Schneider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Decaro + William Bloomquist134 matchesnot enough data
David Ponder + William Bloomquist134 matchesnot enough data
Dennis Weikel + William Bloomquist303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Ponder
48W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dennis Weikel
147W–171L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
Steve McCoy
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
William Bloomquist
68W–81L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Jeffrey Decaro
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Schneider
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.