Teams

Ft Gatlin-Zogheib-Team Z

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-01vs Ft Gatlin-MassadWon 10
W#2 DoublesJuan Camilo Ramirez / Pauline Peterkin vs Gail Burr / David Burr6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-25vs Sanlando-MayorcaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndresa Maia / Ernesto Gonzalez vs Athena Wong / Marc Rubinstein1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSelen Gokce / Prakriti Das vs Sedigheh Hasani / Walter Paniagua del Castillo2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesClaire LaBrunerie / Rodrigo Sanchez vs GIANNINA RISCO / Cesar Fischer1-6, 1-6
2025-04-13vs Red Bug-FaubertLost 01
L#3 DoublesPrakriti Das / Pauline Peterkin vs Rob Vinson / Gaby Hansen4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
CARLOS GUERRERO
published 4
3.43
Ernesto Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Prakriti Das
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Pauline Peterkin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Claire LaBrunerie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Michelle Ford
published
2.90
Juan Camilo Ramirez
published
2.89
Moe Zogheib
published
2.87
Selen Gokce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Rodrigo Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Andresa Maia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Meredith Gallagher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ernesto Gonzalez + Andresa Maia0540% gamesnot enough data
Selen Gokce + CARLOS GUERRERO3255% gamesnot enough data
Selen Gokce + Moe Zogheib5082% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
CARLOS GUERRERO
26W–12L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
3.60
Ernesto Gonzalez
13W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Prakriti Das
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
3.5
Pauline Peterkin
78W–68L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Claire LaBrunerie
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Michelle Ford
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Juan Camilo Ramirez
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
Moe Zogheib
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Selen Gokce
17W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Rodrigo Sanchez
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
3
Andresa Maia
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Meredith Gallagher
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.