Teams

Crooked Creek (Madeline Gmahle)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Business Women (Tuesday PM) · 3.0 (Arrie Lugar)

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 (Arrie Lugar) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Heleen Honeyborne
published
3.11
3.07
Elizabeth Sommet
published
2.95
Ann-Marie Sharp
published 3
2.89
Suzanne Compton
published
2.88
Lyuda Spiegel
published
2.58
Madeline Jove
published
2.58
Lisa Rivas
published
2.57
Madeline Gmahle
published
Gina Guhl
published
Kimball Thomas
published
Mary Giraldi
published
Oksana Porwal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann-Marie Sharp + Laura Jansen van Vuuren10072% games+9.1% vs expected
Lisa Rivas + Suzanne Compton3544% games−5.3% vs expected
Madeline Gmahle + Lisa Rivas3641% gamesnot enough data
Madeline Jove + Ann-Marie Sharp404 matchesnot enough data
Lyuda Spiegel + Lisa Rivas224 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Compton + Elizabeth Sommet314 matchesnot enough data
Lyuda Spiegel + Madeline Gmahle213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Rivas + Ann-Marie Sharp213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heleen Honeyborne
26W–23L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.14
Laura Jansen van Vuuren
28W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
Elizabeth Sommet
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.07
3
Ann-Marie Sharp
33W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Suzanne Compton
48W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Lyuda Spiegel
55W–48L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
Madeline Jove
20W–28L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
2.58
Lisa Rivas
21W–34L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.58
Madeline Gmahle
31W–36L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57
Gina Guhl
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kimball Thomas
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Giraldi
3W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Oksana Porwal
2W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.