Teams

LBK Club Gutridge

2023 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Wednesday

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-08vs Courtside KennedySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMalgorzata Pilch / Ann Miklas vs Karen Kennedy / Laura Carey6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAnn Fangue / Deanna Rollyson vs Patty Buggy / Sandra Murphy6-0, 1-6, 1-0
2023-03-01vs LWR SteffensWon 10
W#1 DoublesCyn Gillespie / Ann Miklas vs Martina Kralickova / Donna Love6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-02-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesDeanna Rollyson / Cyn Gillespie vs Julie Deluca / Andrea Anderson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-08vs Heritage Oaks NealeWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Miklas / Malgorzata Pilch vs Lisa Falk / Pamela Mansager7-5, 6-2
2023-02-01vs Payne Park LacroixLost 01
L#1 DoublesCyn Gillespie / Ann Miklas vs Jean Caudle / Laura Naramore3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-25vs LWN ArringtonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeanna Rollyson / Jana Bekavac vs Sherry Chase / Tammy Hallam6-4, 6-4
2023-01-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Miklas / Cyn Gillespie vs Debbie Mays / Linda Mulcahy1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Ann Miklas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Cyn Gillespie
published 3.5
3.42
Deanna Rollyson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.58
Ruth Meadows
published
Ann Fangue
published
Jana Bekavac
published
Julie McGue
published
Lois Karran
published
Malgorzata Pilch
published
Marcia Gutridge
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Miklas + Deanna Rollyson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Miklas
109W–67L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Cyn Gillespie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Deanna Rollyson
39W–33L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Ruth Meadows
71W–60L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.58
Ann Fangue
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jana Bekavac
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie McGue
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lois Karran
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Malgorzata Pilch
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcia Gutridge
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.