Teams

SDNC 4.0WE RPTC/ Schwab

2022 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WE Women · SDNC - Women- WE 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.79 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-12vs SDNC 4.0WE RB S&TC/ MaddenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnn Hou / Grace Reyno vs Stephanie Smith / Di Desiderio6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNelda Swanson / Desiree Seager vs Teri Williams / April Guerieri3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-05vs SDNC 4.0WE San Dieguito TC/ FroydLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Lemker / Inge Bisconer vs Eva Froyd / Suzie Russell1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-22vs SDNC 4.0WE RB S&TC/ MaddenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Lemker / Julie Read vs Teri Williams / April Guerieri3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesInge Bisconer / Sharon Schwab vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-08vs SDNC WE LLW 4.0 RBCTC/ FrezLost 02
L#1 SinglesSharon Schwab vs Olivia Bondarev3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDesiree Seager / Inge Bisconer vs Pamela Newman / Michall Saccuzzo4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-05-01vs SDNC 4.0WE RB S&TC/ MaddenLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Hou / Grace Reyno vs Stephanie Smith / Di Desiderio2-6, 1-6
2022-04-24vs SDNC WE LLW 4.0 RBCTC/ FrezLost 02
L#1 DoublesTatiana Vaschenko / Desiree Seager vs Pamela Newman / Michall Saccuzzo6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSharon Schwab vs Olivia Bondarev2-6, 3-6
2022-04-10vs SDNC WE LLW 4.0 RBCTC/ FrezSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Lemker / Julie Read vs Stacey Dusseault / Joan Rogers1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDesiree Seager / Nelda Swanson vs Michall Saccuzzo / Pamela Newman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women- WE 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Ann Hou
published 4
Deborah Parks
published 4
3.67
Desiree Seager
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Inge Bisconer
published 4
3.52
Nelda Swanson
published
3.36
Sharon Schwab
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Kelly Lemker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Ping Chen
published
3.27
Grace Reyno
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Julie Read
published
Stacy Herman
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ann Hou
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Deborah Parks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Desiree Seager
112W–100L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Inge Bisconer
38W–41L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
Nelda Swanson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Sharon Schwab
51W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Kelly Lemker
85W–67L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Ping Chen
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Grace Reyno
44W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Julie Read
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Stacy Herman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.