← Teams

MAC-Pickard

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.8 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Kim Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Patrick Herbst
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Heidi Wilcox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Catherine Go
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Bill Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.43
Terri Pickard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.24
Tony Humpage
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Kristin Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.75
Mike Delman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-05-20Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesLinda Lovett / Bill Henderson vs Donald Pettitt / Babette Zielinski6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Campbell / Kristin Campbell vs Eric Anderson / Lynne Gaerisch6-2, 7-5
2022-05-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesPatrick Herbst / Catherine Go vs Jonathan Quon / Patricia Sturr7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBill Henderson / Terri Pickard vs Kevin Oloughlin / Christine Wall6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWilliam Campbell / Kristin Campbell vs John McLain / Donna Roisom6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2022-05-07Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesCatherine Go / Bill Henderson vs Peter Aleman / Denise Dawkins6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Hall / Terri Pickard vs Alan Jones / Nikki Nadig4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKim Stevens / Kit Johnson vs Susan Agee / JT Smith3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJack Henry / Linda Lovett vs Frank Collie / Mary Lowblad6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPatrick Herbst / Kim Stevens vs Christopher Gilmore / Kyoko Adcock6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMike Delman / Terri Pickard vs Kerry Jantzi / Michelle Donato6-0, 6-3
2022-04-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesPatrick Herbst / Kim Stevens vs Frank Collie / Kate Leatherbarrow6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJack Henry / Heidi Wilcox vs Kyoko Adcock / Stefan Olander6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKit Johnson / Linda Lovett vs Kay Dobashi / Christopher Gilmore6-4, 7-6
2022-04-15Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLinda Lovett / Kit Johnson vs Kristi Vargas / Alan Kaplan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Stevens / Bill Henderson vs Lisa West / Michael Lavios7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSally Lovett / Patrick Herbst vs Frederique Lavios / Kevin Semonsen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-30Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSally Lovett / Bill Henderson vs Jonathan Quon / Karen Groenweghe6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeidi Wilcox / Patrick Herbst vs Tom Lonergan / Roxanne Imbrie7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Mike Delman vs Christine Wall / Kevin Oloughlin6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-18Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesHeidi Wilcox / John Hall vs Susan Ford / Alan Jones6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Jack Henry vs Kim Wheeler / Jim Wheeler6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kim Stevens
56W–44L career
not enough data
—
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Patrick Herbst
44W–45L career
18%82%0%
3.60
4
Heidi Wilcox
86W–87L career
15%85%0%
3.58
4
Catherine Go
87W–77L career
18%82%0%
3.58
4
Bill Henderson
108W–120L career
46%54%0%
3.46
4
Terri Pickard
44W–44L career
52%48%0%
3.43
3.5
Tony Humpage
99W–73L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Kristin Campbell
32W–52L career
10%90%0%
3.13
3
Mike Delman
4W–8L career
8%87%5%
2.75

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.