Teams

Team 8 Dream Team

2025 NOVA Singles · NOVA Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-25Won 10
W#3 SinglesMary Tisch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-19Won 10
W#1 SinglesJulia Hyeon vs Courtney Brown6-1, 6-1
2025-10-18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesColleen Peacher vs Anna Chen0-6, 0-6
2025-10-17vs Team 1 The AvengersWon 21
W#1 SinglesJulia Hyeon vs Caixia Che6-2, 2-2
L#2 SinglesColleen Peacher vs Yiqing Wang1-6, 4-5
W#3 SinglesClaire Bosch Zuazo vs Qing Lin6-1, 6-2
2025-10-11vs Team 6 Honey Deuces 3.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesJulia Hyeon vs Brenda Nguyen6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesClaire Bosch Zuazo vs Hiam Eljazzar5-7, 1-1
2025-10-03vs Team 4 Capital CrushLost 01
L#3 SinglesMary Tisch vs Amy Cahoon1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesClaire Bosch Zuazo vs Liping Wang4-6, 0-4
2025-09-19vs Team 9 Tennis BeansSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJulia Hyeon vs Natalie Chow2-6, 3-3
W#2 SinglesClaire Bosch Zuazo vs Hazel Yang6-3, 2-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Jessica Tobin
published
3.40
Julia Hyeon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Colleen Peacher
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Claire Bosch Zuazo
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Olivia Tate
published
3.20
Barbara Hancock
published 3.5
3.20
Mimi Vu
published
2.89
Noeline Arul
published
2.86
Mary Tisch
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Tisch + Claire Bosch Zuazo6352% games+6.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Tobin
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Julia Hyeon
33W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Colleen Peacher
119W–124L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Claire Bosch Zuazo
57W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Olivia Tate
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Barbara Hancock
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Mimi Vu
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Noeline Arul
16W–44L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89
3
Mary Tisch
71W–105L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.