Teams

MG Torbert/ Loe

2025 Spring USTA 40 & Over Night League - Montgomery · 4.0 Men Night

12 players · average NTRP 3.94 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesDavid Burke / Mitchell Powell vs Tim Herndon / Stephen Nettelhorst6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrian Cone vs Dean Dunlavy6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeff Rice / Paul Winn vs Jarred Kaplan / Sukno Park6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGreg Alford / Charlie Trotman vs Billy Foxworth / Albert Smith7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesJames Armstrong / David Burke vs Tim Herndon / Keith Wilson3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesEdwin Hampton vs Dean Dunlavy6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHarrison Campbell / Clay Torbert vs Stephen Gratz / Stephen Nettelhorst6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGreg Alford / Mark Caradori vs Jarred Kaplan / Nghia Nguyen6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesGreg Alford / Harrison Campbell vs Jarred Kaplan / Sukno Park6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJames Armstrong / Paul Winn vs Stephen Nettelhorst / Tim Herndon4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEdwin Hampton / Charlie Trotman vs Stephen Gratz / Albert Smith4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesClay Torbert / Paul Winn vs Tim Herndon / Nghia Nguyen6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHarrison Campbell vs Dean Dunlavy6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrian Cone / Mitchell Powell vs Jarred Kaplan / Sukno Park6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGreg Alford / Edwin Hampton vs Albert Smith / Stephen Gratz6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesMark Caradori / Paul Winn vs Olivier Dury / Tim Herndon6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesHarrison Campbell vs Dean Dunlavy6-3, 4-3
W#2 DoublesGreg Alford / Edwin Hampton vs Nghia Nguyen / Sukno Park6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJames Armstrong / Jeff Rice vs Stephen Gratz / Albert Smith2-6, 3-0
2025-02-04vs Lagoon - Harris - 4.0 - 40 - SpringSplit 22
L#1 DoublesGreg Alford / Harrison Campbell vs Stephen Nettelhorst / Keith Wilson5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesEdwin Hampton vs Dean Dunlavy6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Burke / Paul Winn vs Tim Herndon / Sukno Park6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMark Caradori / Charlie Trotman vs Nghia Nguyen / Albert Smith1-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesDavid Burke / Paul Winn vs Stephen Nettelhorst / Albert Smith6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesHarrison Campbell vs Dean Dunlavy6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEdwin Hampton / Charlie Trotman vs Tim Herndon / Sukno Park6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesGreg Alford / James Armstrong vs Billy Foxworth / Jarred Kaplan7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Brian Cone
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
4.01
Harrison Campbell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.93
Edwin Hampton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.89
Mitchell Powell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Paul Winn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Mark Caradori
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
David Burke
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Greg Alford
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Clay Torbert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
James Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Charlie Trotman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
David Loe
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harrison Campbell + Brian Cone10266% games+6.7% vs expected
Mitchell Powell + Greg Alford10165% games+3.5% vs expected
Harrison Campbell + Greg Alford8162% games+2.4% vs expected
Mark Caradori + Greg Alford4161% gamesnot enough data
Charlie Trotman + Greg Alford2347% gamesnot enough data
Mitchell Powell + David Burke404 matchesnot enough data
Mitchell Powell + Brian Cone314 matchesnot enough data
James Armstrong + Greg Alford404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Cone
31W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Harrison Campbell
56W–9L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Edwin Hampton
26W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
Mitchell Powell
28W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
Paul Winn
21W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
Mark Caradori
18W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
David Burke
35W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Greg Alford
89W–45L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Clay Torbert
11W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
James Armstrong
23W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Charlie Trotman
7W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
David Loe
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.