Teams

Th.Critcher40C5.5

2026 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Ca.Jones40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesDina Berling / Griffin Lamb vs Alice Touchette / Caroline Bell-luehrs6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatherine Seawell-Lewis / Richelle Fox vs Cameron Jones / Rachael Van6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Guy / Emily Boyer vs Sara Fitzpatrick / Amanda Meyer6-3, 6-2
2026-08-19vs Je.SagalSolomon40CLost 12
W#1 DoublesAshley Walker / Richelle Fox vs Catherine Langlois / Marilyn Gordian6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKari Barsness / Dina Berling vs Kristen Deak / Gail Scoggin4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStephanie Suski / Emily Boyer vs Lori Sykes / Carolyn Wieber6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-08-05vs Am.Ray40CWon 21
W#1 DoublesDina Berling / Jennifer Guy vs Kimberlei Gill / Louella Venable6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebekah Noulles / Katherine Seawell-Lewis vs Donna Driscoll / Ann Flores2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRichelle Fox / Stephanie Suski vs Lorna Hirsch / Amie Ray6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings23 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ke.Hurter40C5.53063676
2Ca.Novak40C2060140
3Ki.Manning40C5.52051231
4Ke.Blevins40C2163973
5Th.Critcher40C5.51021327
6Am.Ray40C1142451
7Al.Dugan40C1133647
8Je.SagalSolomon40C1124862
9Be.Farrell40C1124853
10La.Edgerton40C12451291
11Ra.Rosen40C000000
12St.Styers40C000000
13Be.Pitt40C000000
14Da.Rusnak40C000000
15El.Nixon40C000000
16La.Daigle40C000000
17He.Caracio40C000000
18Ma.Springfield40C000000
19Ki.Lamb40C5.50112433
20We.Bargoil40C0103637
21Ca.Jones40C0103638
22Br.Robinson40C0224968
23Ka.Landi40C03271493

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Griffin Lamb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.12
Katherine Seawell-Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Stephanie Suski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Kari Barsness
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Jennifer Guy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Theresa Critcher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Britt Tolliver
published 3
2.85
Tiffany Thompson
published
2.52
Leanne Stradling
published
2.35
Richelle Fox
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Rebekah Noulles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Dina Berling
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Critcher + Jennifer Guy15560% games+7.1% vs expected
Kari Barsness + Griffin Lamb17758% games+3.2% vs expected
Tiffany Thompson + Britt Tolliver6354% games+0.4% vs expected
Stephanie Suski + Theresa Critcher8653% gamesnot enough data
Katherine Seawell-Lewis + Griffin Lamb314 matchesnot enough data
Kari Barsness + Stephanie Suski213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Griffin Lamb
141W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.17
3
Katherine Seawell-Lewis
110W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.12
3
Stephanie Suski
125W–101L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Kari Barsness
125W–125L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.98
3
Jennifer Guy
70W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Theresa Critcher
132W–78L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Britt Tolliver
18W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Tiffany Thompson
13W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Leanne Stradling
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Richelle Fox
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Rebekah Noulles
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Dina Berling
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.