Teams

Midtown/Rivera/Hernandez

2025 Broward Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.12 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-12vs Broward/Contreras/40&Over3.5WLost 02
L#3 DoublesMaria Parjus / Shamena Khan vs Natasha Burkett / Melissa Morim3-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesMartha Barliza / Deborah Marshall vs Yana Liu / Yrma Petersen2-6, 6-7
2025-03-05vs Sunrise/RogersonLost 02
L#1 DoublesGiuliana Zunino-Ribas / Maria Parjus vs Gabriela Hernandez Lavoy / Kelly Urban5-7, 4-6
L#4 DoublesMariaIsabel Guevara / Martha Barliza vs Gina Powers / Huey Song6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-19vs Wrc/ReamLost 02
L#1 DoublesLedaliz Collazo / Shamena Khan vs Itala Ream / Maria Lanza1-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesMartha Barliza / Maria Parjus vs Carol Kelly / Pilar Escobar1-6, 0-6
2025-02-12vs WestonHills/BolanosWon 10
W#4 DoublesGiuliana Zunino-Ribas / Maria Parjus vs Claudia Torres / Mercedes Miodownik6-3, 7-6
2025-02-05vs Dillon/CarusoLost 02
L#1 SinglesGiuliana Zunino-Ribas vs Christine Picanza1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLedaliz Collazo / Shamena Khan vs Theresa Caruso / Sara Kane3-6, 5-7
2025-02-04vs Midtown/MontserratLost 01
L#1 SinglesShamena Khan vs Andrea Tarud2-6, 0-6
2025-01-29vs Piccolo/DuranteSplit 11
W#1 SinglesShamena Khan vs Gloria Marquez6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGiuliana Zunino-Ribas / Juan Yang vs Milka Vignali / Gisela Coluccio1-6, 0-6
2025-01-15vs MissionB/Cancelliere/AlvarezLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessika Bolin / Giuliana Zunino-Ribas vs Daniela Romay / Davina Cancelliere5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesShamena Khan vs Marie Ferrigno6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Laura Hernandez
published
3.30
Stacy Havens
published
3.20
Carolina Rivera
published 3.5
3.20
Sondra Carpio
published
3.17
Liliana Carrillo
published
3.15
Juan Yang
published
3.13
MariaIsabel Guevara
published
3.10
Ledaliz Collazo
published
3.05
Maria Parjus
published
3.04
Sheryl Hurwit
published
3.04
Martha Barliza
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Shamena Khan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.00
Julia Sturm
published
2.90
Giuliana Zunino-Ribas
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.88
Jessika Bolin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessika Bolin + Shamena Khan9163% games+11.0% vs expected
Martha Barliza + Shamena Khan12656% games+6.3% vs expected
Shamena Khan + Giuliana Zunino-Ribas3353% gamesnot enough data
Sheryl Hurwit + Julia Sturm134 matchesnot enough data
Maria Parjus + Shamena Khan033 matchesnot enough data
Martha Barliza + Giuliana Zunino-Ribas123 matchesnot enough data
Giuliana Zunino-Ribas + Liliana Carrillo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Hernandez
12W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Stacy Havens
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Carolina Rivera
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Sondra Carpio
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Liliana Carrillo
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Juan Yang
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
MariaIsabel Guevara
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Ledaliz Collazo
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Maria Parjus
3W–25L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Sheryl Hurwit
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Martha Barliza
50W–91L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Shamena Khan
133W–140L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Julia Sturm
4W–17L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Giuliana Zunino-Ribas
61W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
Jessika Bolin
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.