Teams

AU - Rose

2025 Auburn USTA Mixed Doubles 40 & Over July Tournament · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Mixed

8 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-13vs Charlie & Ginelle-YTC-40 -4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesSam Wasko / Jennifer Hemstreet vs Ginelle Weissinger / Changchun Hao7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKent Bailey / Sherry Clark vs Dan Hart / Melinda Weissinger6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLance Brown / Maya Rose vs Charles Harrison / Michelle Crisler6-4, 6-1
2025-07-12vs Charlie & Ginelle-YTC-40 -4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesSam Wasko / Jennifer Hemstreet vs Greg Niedzwiecki / Ginelle Weissinger3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLance Brown / Maya Rose vs Changchun Hao / Brenda Nell7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeah Taylor / Matthew Gaston vs Michelle Crisler / Charles Harrison6-3, 7-6
2025-07-11vs Gina McIntosh-YTC-40 -4.0 MixedLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeah Taylor / Matthew Gaston vs Courtney Manasco / Jason Dearing3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSam Wasko / Jennifer Hemstreet vs John Brackin / Tina Mills6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMaya Rose / Mark Barron vs Sarah Mizell / Michael Lewis3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Sherry Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Maya Rose
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Jennifer Hemstreet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Mark Barron
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Matthew Gaston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Kent Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Lance Brown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Stephanie Heckler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kent Bailey + Sherry Clark314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sherry Clark
47W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Maya Rose
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Jennifer Hemstreet
19W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Mark Barron
17W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Matthew Gaston
22W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Kent Bailey
16W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
Lance Brown
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Stephanie Heckler
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.