Teams

KF.Evans

2025 CTRL Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-24vs CAS.TrailLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlice Schoots / Virginia Lewis vs Ann Locher / Jane Hoffman2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesWilda Eade / Jane Doe vs Michiyo Pedersen / Joanne Kearney6-7, 4-6
2025-04-17vs TOC.PowellLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilda Eade / Virginia Lewis vs Kellie Snider / Tara LeFevre3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesHanna Sturgis / Robin Evans vs Takako Schenberger / Karen Zapko5-7, 1-6
2025-03-27vs TOC.IrishSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlice Schoots / Virginia Lewis vs Yvonne Acker / Shelly Jude6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesWilda Eade / Hanna Sturgis vs Monica Palmer / Mary T Long2-6, 3-6
2025-03-20vs TOC.RessLost 02
L#1 DoublesSue Hackney / Virginia Lewis vs Maya Ress / Anne-Marie Conklin3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJane Doe / Alice Schoots vs Virginia Brezac / Elizabeth Flynt2-6, 1-6
2025-03-13vs LOCH.TerjesenLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlice Schoots / Mary Ann Bacon vs Gillian Kelleher / Judith Stewart3-6, 3-6
2025-03-06vs PW.FrancisLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Bacon / Alice Schoots vs Leah Lee / Rebecca Jacobsen7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2025-02-27vs PW.StylskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Doe / Makereta Fitzcharles vs Carole Bobby / Rosalind Manning0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Virginia Lewis
published
3.27
Makereta Fitzcharles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Alice Schoots
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.16
Legare Woods
published
3.09
Sue Hackney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Wilda Eade
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Hanna Sturgis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alice Schoots + Sue Hackney4354% gamesnot enough data
Makereta Fitzcharles + Sue Hackney5155% gamesnot enough data
Alice Schoots + Wilda Eade134 matchesnot enough data
Alice Schoots + Hanna Sturgis224 matchesnot enough data
Alice Schoots + Virginia Lewis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Virginia Lewis
28W–25L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Makereta Fitzcharles
47W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alice Schoots
91W–113L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Legare Woods
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Sue Hackney
80W–46L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Wilda Eade
38W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Hanna Sturgis
81W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.