Teams

RCC Wozniak

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-14vs Westwood Caudill/DeanLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Albrecht / Catena Armstrong vs Sarah Paladino-strater / Jana Chesley2-6, 1-6
2025-09-13vs ACAC Davis Girls on FireLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberl Hale / Amy Wozniak vs Rose Bennett / Tatiana Bueno4-6, 5-4
L#3 DoublesSabrina Henderson / Kathleen Mills vs Patti Bryan / Susan Winckler2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Albrecht / Aida Saydiova vs Precious Bryant / Carolyn Hawley6-4, 7-6
2025-08-24vs Combo Clobber Time - CheekLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Albrecht / Catena Armstrong vs Sugandha Agarwal / Madelyn Parikh2-6, 1-6
2025-08-10vs Westwood - ZachLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristine Albrecht / Stephanie Grassi vs Catherine Stanley / Molly McEvoy3-6, 3-6
2025-08-02vs Belmont SherdelLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Albrecht / Pamela Albrecht vs Mary Church / Anne Walker5-7, 4-6
2025-07-27vs RMC SweeneyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatena Armstrong / Amy Wozniak vs Alison Spelbring / Amanda Keyes1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSabrina Henderson / Beverly Davis vs Eliza Causey / Jennifer Albis3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPam Koch / Stephanie Grassi vs Kandy Baserap / Julie Scott1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Christine Albrecht
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Berkeley Darr
published 3.5
3.05
Kimberl Hale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Pam Koch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Nicky Granback
published
2.64
Amy Wozniak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Alison Gooding
published 3
2.50
Beverly Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Sabrina Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.36
Catena Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.05
Aida Saydiova
published 2.5
Kathleen Mills
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Grassi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Albrecht
122W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Berkeley Darr
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
Kimberl Hale
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Pam Koch
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.86
Nicky Granback
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Amy Wozniak
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Alison Gooding
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.50
3
Beverly Davis
4W–28L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.50
Sabrina Henderson
4W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.50
2.5
Catena Armstrong
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Aida Saydiova
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Kathleen Mills
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Grassi
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.